Browse by Uncontrolled Keywords
Number of items: 15.
2005
Ogilvie, D;
Egan, M;
Hamilton, V;
Petticrew, M;
(2005)
Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 2. Best available evidence: how low should you go?
Journal of epidemiology and community health, 59 (10).
pp. 886-92.
ISSN 0143-005X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.034199
Full text not available from this repository.
Ogilvie, D;
Hamilton, V;
Egan, M;
Petticrew, M;
(2005)
Systematic reviews of health effects of social interventions: 1. Finding the evidence: how far should you go?
Journal of epidemiology and community health, 59 (9).
pp. 804-8.
ISSN 0143-005X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.034181
Full text not available from this repository.
2004
Pound, P;
Ebrahim, S;
Sandercock, P;
Bracken, MB;
Roberts, I;
(2004)
Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?
BMJ, 328 (7438).
pp. 514-517.
ISSN 1468-5833
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7438.514
2003
Morrison, DS;
Petticrew, M;
Thomson, H;
(2003)
What are the most effective ways of improving population health through transport interventions? Evidence from systematic reviews.
Journal of epidemiology and community health, 57 (5).
pp. 327-33.
ISSN 0143-005X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.5.327
Full text not available from this repository.
Normand, C;
(2003)
New BMJ policy on economic evaluations: economic evaluations are often based on many studies [Letter to editor].
BMJ (Clinical research ed), 326 (7386).
445; author reply 445.
ISSN 0959-8138
https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/17975
Petticrew, M;
(2003)
Presumed innocent. Why we need systematic reviews of social policies.
American journal of preventive medicine, 24 (3 Supp).
pp. 2-3.
ISSN 0749-3797
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00650-5
Full text not available from this repository.
Petticrew, M;
(2003)
Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions.
BMJ, 326 (7392).
pp. 756-8.
ISSN 1468-5833
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7392.756
2002
Edwards, P;
Clarke, M;
DiGuiseppi, C;
Pratap, S;
Roberts, I;
Wentz, R;
(2002)
Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records.
Statistics in medicine, 21 (11).
pp. 1635-40.
ISSN 0277-6715
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1190
Full text not available from this repository.
Elbourne, DR;
Altman, DG;
Higgins, JP;
Curtin, F;
Worthington, HV;
Vail, A;
(2002)
Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues.
International journal of epidemiology, 31 (1).
pp. 140-9.
ISSN 0300-5771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.1.140
Full text not available from this repository.
Goodwin, DM;
Higginson, IJ;
Edwards, AGK;
Finlay, IG;
Cook, AM;
Hood, K;
Douglas, HR;
Normand, CE;
(2002)
An evaluation of systematic reviews of palliative care services.
Journal of palliative care, 18 (2).
pp. 77-83.
ISSN 0825-8597
https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/16838
Full text not available from this repository.
Petticrew, M;
Wilson, P;
Wright, K;
Song, F;
(2002)
Quality of Cochrane reviews. Quality of Cochrane reviews is better than that of non-Cochrane reviews.
BMJ, 324 (7336).
p. 545.
ISSN 1468-5833
https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/8729
Rees, K;
Ebrahim, S;
(2002)
Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Ill defined inclusion criteria resulted in missed trials.
BMJ, 324 (7337).
p. 611.
ISSN 1468-5833
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.611
Sandercock, P;
Roberts, I;
(2002)
Systematic reviews of animal experiments.
Lancet, 360 (9333).
p. 586.
ISSN 0140-6736
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09812-4
Full text not available from this repository.
2001
Cook, AM;
Finlay, EG;
Edwards, AGK;
Hood, K;
Higginson, IJ;
Goodwin, DM;
Normand, CE;
Douglas, HR;
(2001)
Efficiency of searching the grey literature in palliative care.
Journal of pain and symptom management, 22 (3).
pp. 797-801.
ISSN 0885-3924
https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/16832
Full text not available from this repository.
Petticrew, M;
(2001)
Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions.
BMJ (Clinical research ed), 322 (7278).
pp. 98-101.
ISSN 0959-8138
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7278.98