Biodiversity pressure from fruit and vegetable consumption in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa varies by product and growing location.

Chapman, ASORCID logo; Green, RORCID logo; Hadida, GORCID logo; Kennard, HORCID logo; Mabhaudhi, TORCID logo; Scheelbeek, PORCID logo; Dalin, CORCID logo and (2025) Biodiversity pressure from fruit and vegetable consumption in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa varies by product and growing location. Nature food. ISSN 2662-1355 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-025-01222-y
Copy

In many countries around the world, fruit and vegetable consumption must increase to improve human health, potentially pressuring local and global biodiversity. Here we use biodiversity-pressure metrics to compare the biodiversity pressures associated with fruits and vegetables consumed in the United Kingdom, India and South Africa. We found that biodiversity pressure for individual crops varies greatly with origin. In all three countries, imported fruits are typically associated with greater pressure than domestically grown fruits. Contrastingly, in India and South Africa, imported vegetables generally have a lower biodiversity pressure than domestically grown vegetables. Oranges, popular in the United Kingdom and South Africa, exert almost three times more biodiversity pressure than bananas-one of the most-consumed fruits in the United Kingdom and India. Our analysis illustrates the quantification of crop-specific biodiversity pressures and provides evidence for the development of more sustainable food systems.


picture_as_pdf
Chapman-etal-2025-Biodiversity-pressure-from-fruit.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads