Association between oral anticoagulants and COVID-19-related outcomes: a population-based cohort study.

Angel Ys Wong ORCID logo ; Laurie Tomlinson ORCID logo ; Jeremy P Brown ; William Elson ; Alex J Walker ; Anna Schultze ORCID logo ; Caroline E Morton ; David Evans ; Peter Inglesby ; Brian MacKenna ; +21 more... Krishnan Bhaskaran ORCID logo ; Christopher T Rentsch ORCID logo ; Emma Powell ORCID logo ; Elizabeth Williamson ORCID logo ; Richard Croker ; Seb Bacon ; William Hulme ; Chris Bates ; Helen J Curtis ; Amir Mehrkar ; Jonathan Cockburn ; Helen I McDonald ORCID logo ; Rohini Mathur ORCID logo ; Kevin Wing ORCID logo ; Harriet Forbes ORCID logo ; Rosalind M Eggo ORCID logo ; Stephen Jw Evans ORCID logo ; Liam Smeeth ORCID logo ; Ben Goldacre ORCID logo ; Ian J Douglas ORCID logo ; (The OpenSAFELY Collaborative) ; (2022) Association between oral anticoagulants and COVID-19-related outcomes: a population-based cohort study. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 72 (720). e456-e463. ISSN 0960-1643 DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0689
Copy

BACKGROUND: Early evidence has shown that anticoagulant reduces the risk of thrombotic events in those infected with COVID-19. However, evidence of the role of routinely prescribed oral anticoagulants (OACs) in COVID-19 outcomes is limited. AIM: To investigate the association between OACs and COVID-19 outcomes in those with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2. DESIGN AND SETTING: On behalf of NHS England, a population-based cohort study was conducted. METHOD: The study used primary care data and pseudonymously-linked SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing data, hospital admissions, and death records from England. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for COVID-19 outcomes comparing people with current OAC use versus non-use, accounting for age, sex, comorbidities, other medications, deprivation, and general practice. RESULTS: Of 71 103 people with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2, there were 52 832 current OAC users and 18 271 non-users. No difference in risk of being tested for SARS-CoV-2 was associated with current use (adjusted HR [aHR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.04) versus non-use. A lower risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (aHR 0.77, 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.95) and a marginally lower risk of COVID-19-related death (aHR, 0.74, 95% CI = 0.53 to 1.04) were associated with current use versus non-use. CONCLUSION: Among those at low baseline stroke risk, people receiving OACs had a lower risk of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 and severe COVID-19 outcomes than non-users; this might be explained by a causal effect of OACs in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes or unmeasured confounding, including more cautious behaviours leading to reduced infection risk.


picture_as_pdf
BJGP.2021.0689.full.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads