Madhi, Shabir A; Baillie, Vicky; Cutland, Clare L; Voysey, Merryn; Koen, Anthonet L; Fairlie, Lee; Padayachee, Sherman D; Dheda, Keertan; Barnabas, Shaun L; Bhorat, Qasim E; +43 more... Briner, Carmen; Kwatra, Gaurav; Ahmed, Khatija; Aley, Parvinder; Bhikha, Sutika; Bhiman, Jinal N; Bhorat, As'ad E; du Plessis, Jeanine; Esmail, Aliasgar; Groenewald, Marisa; Horne, Elizea; Hwa, Shi-Hsia; Jose, Aylin; Lambe, Teresa; Laubscher, Matt; Malahleha, Mookho; Masenya, Masebole; Masilela, Mduduzi; McKenzie, Shakeel; Molapo, Kgaogelo; Moultrie, Andrew; Oelofse, Suzette; Patel, Faeezah; Pillay, Sureshnee; Rhead, Sarah; Rodel, Hylton; Rossouw, Lindie; Taoushanis, Carol; Tegally, Houriiyah; Thombrayil, Asha; van Eck, Samuel; Wibmer, Constantinos K; Durham, Nicholas M; Kelly, Elizabeth J; Villafana, Tonya L; Gilbert, Sarah; Pollard, Andrew J; de Oliveira, Tulio; Moore, Penny L; Sigal, Alex; Izu, Alane; NGS-SA Group; Wits-VIDA COVID Group; (2021) Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant. The New England journal of medicine, 384 (20). pp. 1885-1898. ISSN 0028-4793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2102214
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) in people not infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in South Africa. Participants 18 to less than 65 years of age were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of vaccine containing 5×1010 viral particles or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) 21 to 35 days apart. Serum samples obtained from 25 participants after the second dose were tested by pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization assays against the original D614G virus and the B.1.351 variant. The primary end points were safety and efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic coronavirus 2019 illness (Covid-19) more than 14 days after the second dose. RESULTS: Between June 24 and November 9, 2020, we enrolled 2026 HIV-negative adults (median age, 30 years); 1010 and 1011 participants received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Both the pseudovirus and the live-virus neutralization assays showed greater resistance to the B.1.351 variant in serum samples obtained from vaccine recipients than in samples from placebo recipients. In the primary end-point analysis, mild-to-moderate Covid-19 developed in 23 of 717 placebo recipients (3.2%) and in 19 of 750 vaccine recipients (2.5%), for an efficacy of 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], -49.9 to 59.8). Among the 42 participants with Covid-19, 39 cases (95.1% of 41 with sequencing data) were caused by the B.1.351 variant; vaccine efficacy against this variant, analyzed as a secondary end point, was 10.4% (95% CI, -76.8 to 54.8). The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine did not show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04444674; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR202006922165132).
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases > Department of Infection Biology |
Research Centre | Covid-19 Research |
PubMed ID | 33725432 |
Elements ID | 158315 |
Download
Filename: Madhi_etal_2020-Efficacy-of-the-ChAdOx1-nCoV-19.pdf
Licence: Copyright the publishers
Download