Identifying Care Home Residents in Electronic Health Records - An OpenSAFELY Short Data Report.

Schultze, AORCID logo; Bates, C; Cockburn, J; MacKenna, B; Nightingale, EORCID logo; Curtis, HJ; Hulme, WJORCID logo; Morton, CE; Croker, RORCID logo; Bacon, S; +29 more...McDonald, HIORCID logo; Rentsch, CTORCID logo; Bhaskaran, KORCID logo; Mathur, RORCID logo; Tomlinson, LAORCID logo; Williamson, EJORCID logo; Forbes, H; Tazare, JORCID logo; Grint, DJORCID logo; Walker, AJ; Inglesby, P; DeVito, NJORCID logo; Mehrkar, A; Hickman, G; Davy, S; Ward, T; Fisher, L; Evans, D; Wing, KORCID logo; Wong, AYORCID logo; McManus, R; Parry, JORCID logo; Hester, F; Harper, S; Evans, SJORCID logo; Douglas, IJ; Smeeth, LORCID logo; Eggo, RMORCID logo; Goldacre, BORCID logo and (2021) Identifying Care Home Residents in Electronic Health Records - An OpenSAFELY Short Data Report. Wellcome open research, 6. 90-. ISSN 2398-502X DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16737.1
Copy

Background: Care home residents have been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Electronic Health Records (EHR) hold significant potential for studying the healthcare needs of this vulnerable population; however, identifying care home residents in EHR is not straightforward. We describe and compare three different methods for identifying care home residents in the newly created OpenSAFELY-TPP data analytics platform.  Methods: Working on behalf of NHS England, we identified individuals aged 65 years or older potentially living in a care home on the 1st of February 2020 using (1) a complex address linkage, in which cleaned GP registered addresses were matched to old age care home addresses using data from the Care and Quality Commission (CQC); (2) coded events in the EHR; (3) household identifiers, age and household size to identify households with more than 3 individuals aged 65 years or older as potential care home residents. Raw addresses were not available to the investigators. Results: Of 4,437,286 individuals aged 65 years or older, 2.27% were identified as potential care home residents using the complex address linkage, 1.96% using coded events, 3.13% using household size and age and 3.74% using either of these methods. 53,210 individuals (32.0% of all potential care home residents) were classified as care home residents using all three methods. Address linkage had the largest overlap with the other methods; 93.3% of individuals identified as care home residents using the address linkage were also identified as such using either coded events or household age and size.  Conclusion: We have described the partial overlap between three methods for identifying care home residents in EHR, and provide detailed instructions for how to implement these in OpenSAFELY-TPP to support research into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care home residents.


picture_as_pdf
Identifying Care Home Residents in Electronic Health Records - An OpenSAFELY Short Data Report.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads