Disruptions, restorations and adaptations to health and nutrition service delivery in multiple states across India over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: An observational study.
Avula, Rasmi;
Nguyen, Phuong Hong;
Ashok, Sattvika;
Bajaj, Sumati;
Kachwaha, Shivani;
Pant, Anjali;
Walia, Monika;
Singh, Anshu;
Paul, Anshuman;
Singh, Ayushi;
+25 more...Kulkarni, Bharati;
Singhania, Deepak;
Escobar-Alegria, Jessica;
Augustine, Little Flower;
Khanna, Madhulika;
Krishna, Maitreiyee;
Sundaravathanam, Nandhini;
Nayak, Prakash Kumar;
Sharma, Praveen Kumar;
Makkar, Prerna;
Ghosh, Puspen;
Subramaniam, Sadhana;
Mala, Sai;
Giri, Rakesh;
Jain, Sameeksha;
Banjara, Santosh Kumar;
Nair, Sapna;
Ghosh, Sebanti;
Das, Suman;
Patil, Sumeet;
Mahapatra, Tanmay;
Forissier, Thomas;
Nanda, Priya;
Krishnan, Suneeta;
Menon, Purnima;
(2022)
Disruptions, restorations and adaptations to health and nutrition service delivery in multiple states across India over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020: An observational study.
PloS one, 17 (7).
e0269674.
ISSN 1932-6203
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269674
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
BACKGROUND: Modeling studies estimated severe impacts of potential service delivery disruptions due to COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and child nutrition outcomes. Although anecdotal evidence exists on disruptions, little is known about the actual state of service delivery at scale. We studied disruptions and restorations, challenges and adaptations in health and nutrition service delivery by frontline workers (FLWs) in India during COVID-19 in 2020. METHODS: We conducted phone surveys with 5500 FLWs (among them 3118 Anganwadi Workers) in seven states between August-October 2020, asking about service delivery during April 2020 (T1) and in August-October (T2), and analyzed changes between T1 and T2. We also analyzed health systems administrative data from 704 districts on disruptions and restoration of services between pre-pandemic (December 2019, T0), T1 and T2. RESULTS: In April 2020 (T1), village centers, fixed day events, child growth monitoring, and immunization were provided by <50% of FLWs in several states. Food supplementation was least disrupted. In T2, center-based services were restored by over a third in most states. Administrative data highlights geographic variability in both disruptions and restorations. Most districts had restored service delivery for pregnant women and children by T2 but had not yet reached T0 levels. Adaptations included home delivery (60 to 96%), coordinating with other FLWs (7 to 49%), and use of phones for counseling (~2 to 65%). Personal fears, long distances, limited personal protective equipment, and antagonistic behavior of beneficiaries were reported challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Services to mothers and children were disrupted during stringent lockdown but restored thereafter, albeit not to pre-pandemic levels. Rapid policy guidance and adaptations by FLWs enabled restoration but little remains known about uptake by client populations. As COVID-19 continues to surge in India, focused attention to ensuring essential services is critical to mitigate these major indirect impacts of the pandemic.
