BACKGROUND: Simplified drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) treatment outcome definitions, mostly centred around receipt of treatment and sputum culture status at 6 months after treatment initiation, have been proposed, but have not been widely evaluated in resource-limited settings. OBJECTIVES: To compare DR-TB treatment outcomes, as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) at the time of treatment, with simplified definitions. METHODS: We performed retrospective folder reviews of a cohort of 246 South African DR-TB patients, most of whom developed second-line drug resistance. Sequential treatment outcomes were assigned retrospectively using both simplified Tuberculosis Network European Trials Group (TBNET)-based and 2013 WHO-based definitions. RESULTS: Of 246 patients, 40% were HIV-positive, and 88% developed second-line drug resistance. Patients were observed for a median of 38 (interquartile range 24 - 63) months from DR-TB treatment initiation. Using WHO-based definitions, 93% of patients had >1 sequential outcome, whereas with simplified definitions, 25% of patients had >1 outcome. Fewer outcomes of cure (3% v. 9%) and more outcomes of treatment failure (42% v. 22%) were assigned using simplified definitions. CONCLUSION: Simplified outcome definitions applied to real-world patients with long, often complex treatment histories resulted in underestimating cures and overestimating treatment failures compared with WHO-based definitions. Simplified definitions may identify more individuals at higher risk for treatment failure than WHO-based definitions, but without consistent programmatic follow-up it may be difficult to distinguish cure, failure and loss to follow-up.