Women's preferences regarding options for management of atypical, borderline or low-grade cervical cytological abnormalities: a review of the evidence.


Sadique, MZ; Legood, R; (2011) Women's preferences regarding options for management of atypical, borderline or low-grade cervical cytological abnormalities: a review of the evidence. Cytopathology. ISSN 0956-5507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00873.x

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

M. Z. Sadique and R. Legood Women's preferences regarding options for management of atypical, borderline or low-grade cervical cytological abnormalities: a review of the evidence Objectives:? To review the evidence on women's preferences for and valuation of alternative management pathways following identification of low-grade cytological abnormalities as part of routine cervical cancer screening. The aim was to identify empirical studies evaluating women's preferences regarding alternative management pathways and to compare the impact of alternative elicitation methods on results. Methods:? A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the online bibliographic information service PubMed database. Empirical studies were identified that elicited general preferences, utilities or valuations based on willingness to pay (WTP) with respect to management of low-grade cytology results. Data were extracted on the methodology used and the empirical results. Results:? Where quality of life data were elicited directly from patients that were undergoing management of low-grade abnormalities utilizing direct elicitation techniques such as WTP, general preference questionnaires and the Euroqol, the studies tended towards a preference in favour of HPV testing (and colposcopy referral if HPV positive) rather than repeat cytology. In contrast, where studies included the general population and presented hypothetical scenarios of treatment pathways, and explicitly tried to incorporate assessment of process utility, the evidence indicated a slight tendency to favour repeat cytology. Conclusion:? Consideration of patient preferences in the management of low-grade cytology is important for designing screening protocols. The reviewed studies indicate that potentially different conclusions may be drawn depending on the elicitation methodology and selection of participants in the research.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
PubMed ID: 21658136
Web of Science ID: 304085200005
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/631

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
289Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item