Niyonshaba, Beatrice; Kabugo, Daniel; Nakiganda, Cornety; Otai, Christine; Seela, Margret; Nankabala, Joyce; Nyonyintono, James; Nakakande, Josephine; Kigozi, Tadeo; Vaughan, Madeline; +8 more... Nakamura, Heidi; Paudel, Mohan; Haddix-McKay, Kimber; Al-Haddad, Benjamin JS; Tann, Cally J; Mubiri, Paul; Waiswa, Peter; Magnusson, Brooke; (2025) Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the Hospital to Home discharge and follow-up programme in rural Uganda: a mixed-methods intervention study. BMJ global health, 10 (2). e015945. ISSN 2059-7908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015945
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
Introduction: Over 60% of premature infants are born in Africa or South Asia. Infants born early, small or who become sick after birth have a higher risk of death, poor growth and developmental impairments. Innovative interventions tailored for low- and middle-income countries are essential to help these newborns survive and develop optimally. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of Hospital to Home (H2H), a discharge and follow-up programme for small and sick newborns in rural Uganda. Methods: We compared two cohorts of high-risk hospitalised neonates in Uganda: a historical-comparison cohort receiving standard facility-based care and an intervention cohort that received the H2H programme, a hospital and community spanning package of interventions designed to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. We compared 6-month corrected neurodevelopmental, growth, nutritional and vaccination outcomes between the cohorts complemented by qualitative interviews of caregivers, community health workers and health facility staff. Results: We recruited 191 participants: 91 historical-comparison cohort (born between July and September 2018), and 100 intervention cohort (born July 2019 to February 2020). No statistically significant difference was seen in neurodevelopmental outcomes (adjusted OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.46). Improved vaccination completion (88.5% intervention vs 76.9% comparison, p=0.041), and exclusive breastfeeding rates (42% vs 6.6%, p<0.001) were seen. Caregivers and healthcare workers reported the intervention to be acceptable and feasible in this rural Ugandan setting. Conclusion: The H2H programme was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and healthcare providers. Improved vaccination and exclusive breastfeeding rates were seen in the intervention group when compared with a historical comparison cohort in this rural Ugandan setting. Further investigation on the short and long-term effectiveness of the H2H programme in a government health services setting is warranted.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology & International Health (2023-) |
Research Centre | Centre for Maternal, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH) |
PubMed ID | 39939110 |
Elements ID | 236210 |
Official URL | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015945 |
Download
Filename: Niyonshaba-etal-2025-Feasibility-acceptability-and-preliminary-effectiveness-of-the-Hospital-to-Home-discharge-and-follow-up-programme-in-rural-Uganda.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
Download