Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: Evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership.


Maringe, C; Walters, S; Butler, J; Coleman, MP; Hacker, N; Hanna, L; Mosgaard, BJ; Nordin, A; Rosen, B; Engholm, G; Gjerstorff, ML; Hatcher, J; Johannesen, TB; McGahan, CE; Meechan, D; Middleton, R; Tracey, E; Turner, D; Richards, MA; Rachet, B; ICBP Module 1 Working Group, ; (2012) Stage at diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival: Evidence from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership. Gynecologic oncology, 127 (1). pp. 75-82. ISSN 0090-8258 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.033

[img]
Preview
Text - Accepted Version
License:

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text - Supplemental Material
License:

Download (20kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text - Supplemental Material
License:

Download (42kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigate what role stage at diagnosis bears in international differences in ovarian cancer survival.<br/> METHODS: Data from population-based cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, and the UK were analysed for 20,073 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer during 2004-07. We compare the stage distribution between countries and estimate stage-specific one-year net survival and the excess hazard up to 18months after diagnosis, using flexible parametric models on the log cumulative excess hazard scale.<br/> RESULTS: One-year survival was 69% in the UK, 72% in Denmark and 74-75% elsewhere. In Denmark, 74% of patients were diagnosed with FIGO stages III-IV disease, compared to 60-70% elsewhere. International differences in survival were evident at each stage of disease; women in the UK had lower survival than in the other four countries for patients with FIGO stages III-IV disease (61.4% vs. 65.8-74.4%). International differences were widest for older women and for those with advanced stage or with no stage data.<br/> CONCLUSION: Differences in stage at diagnosis partly explain international variation in ovarian cancer survival, and a more adverse stage distribution contributes to comparatively low survival in Denmark. This could arise because of differences in tumour biology, staging procedures or diagnostic delay. Differences in survival also exist within each stage, as illustrated by lower survival for advanced disease in the UK, suggesting unequal access to optimal treatment. Population-based data on cancer survival by stage are vital for cancer surveillance, and global consensus is needed to make stage data in cancer registries more consistent.<br/>

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Population Health (2012- )
Research Centre: Cancer Survival Group
Centre for Global Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)
Population Studies Group
PubMed ID: 22750127
Web of Science ID: 308783800015
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/38233

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
1,301Downloads
915Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item