Examining the effects of political decentralisation in Kenya on health sector planning and budgeting: a case study of Kilifi County.


Tsofa, BK; (2017) Examining the effects of political decentralisation in Kenya on health sector planning and budgeting: a case study of Kilifi County. DrPH thesis, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. DOI: 10.17037/PUBS.03817566

[img] Text - Accepted Version
Restricted to Registered users only until 20 February 2019.
License:

Download (4077Kb) | Request a copy

Abstract

Health sector decentralisation has been a recurring theme in health systems reform discourse for several decades, particularly in developing countries. Decentralisation is promoted for its ability to strengthen community participation and accountability, and to enhance technical efficiency in the management of limited health sector resources. However, most of the literature on health sector decentralisation has been descriptive, reporting outcomes of different decentralisation models, with minimal analysis of how contextual factors contribute to the observed outcomes. In 2010, Kenya passed a new constitution through a nationwide public referendum. A key feature of this constitution was the introduction of 47 semi-autonomous devolved county governments. This study aimed to describe and analyse the effects of this major political decentralization on planning and budgeting in the health sector at the sub-national level, including the goals and intended strategies for health sector operational planning and budgeting, and stakeholder expectations and experiences of decentralisation. I used a case study design, focusing on Kilifi County, guided by a conceptual framework which drew on decentralisation and policy analysis theories. I used three tracers: planning and budgeting for recurrent expenditures; Human Resources for Health (HRH); and Essential Medicines and Medical Supplies (EMMS) management. I collected qualitative data through document reviews, key informant interviews, and participant and non-participant observations. I found that the Kenyan devolution was largely driven by the need to address political rather that technical challenges in public sector management. To this effect, county level functions were rapidly transferred without proper structures and capacity to undertake these functions leading to major disruption of public services at county level. Within the health sector, the early days witnessed perverse re-centralisation of operational financial management roles from health facility level to the county level. On HRH, there were major disruptions in staff salary payments, political interference with HRH management functions and confusion over certain HRH management roles; leading to industrial strikes and mass resignations by health workers. On EMMS, there were significant delays in the procurement process leading to long periods of stock outs of essential drugs in health facilities. With time though, and with the county governments establishing their structures and progressively building their capacity, a general improvement in counties’ ability to manage devolved functions, including health sector functions has been witnessed and there are deliberate efforts to find local level solutions to some of the emerging challenges. In conclusion I argue that the political push for decentralisation is often stronger than the technical intentions and implementation processes. There is thus need for health sector policy actors to have a broader understanding of the countries’ political context whenever designing technical strategies for implementing health sector decentralisation. In addition, I propose that the allocation of functions between central level and decentralised units should always be guided by considerations around decision space, organisational structure and capacity, and accountability arrangements and practices within the health system.

Item Type: Thesis
Thesis Type: Doctoral
Thesis Name: DrPH
Contributors: Goodman, C (Thesis advisor); Molyneux, S (Thesis advisor); Gilson, L (Thesis advisor);
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Global Health and Development
Research Centre: RESYST (Resilient and Responsive Health Systems)
Projects: KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme
Copyright Holders: Tsofa Benjamin Karabu
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/3817566

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
4Downloads
277Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item