Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations.

Ellsberg, M; Heise, L; Pe?a, R; Agurto, S; Winkvist, A; (2001) Researching domestic violence against women: methodological and ethical considerations. Studies in family planning, 32 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 0039-3665 DOI:

Full text not available from this repository.


The results of three population-based studies on violence against women in Nicaragua are compared in this article. Two of the studies were regional in scope (Le?n and Managua) and focused specifically on women's experiences of violence, whereas the third study was a Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted with a nationally representative sample of women. The lifetime prevalence estimates for women's undergoing physical violence from a partner were significantly higher in the Le?n study (52 percent) and Managua study (69 percent), compared with that given in the DHS (28 percent). Possible explanations for the differences are examined through pooled multivariate logistic regression analysis, as well as analysis of six focus-group discussions carried out with field-workers and staff from the three studies. The most important differences that were found concerned ethical and safety procedures and the interview setting. The results indicate that prevalence estimates for violence are highly sensitive to methodological factors, and that underreporting is a significant threat to validity.

Item Type: Article
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Global Health and Development
Research Centre: Gender Violence and Health Centre
Social and Mathematical Epidemiology (SaME)
PubMed ID: 11326453
Web of Science ID: 168217300001


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item