The combination of effects on lung cancer of cigarette smoking and exposure in Quebec chrysotile miners and millers


Liddell, FDK; Armstrong, BG; (2002) The combination of effects on lung cancer of cigarette smoking and exposure in Quebec chrysotile miners and millers. The Annals of occupational hygiene, 46 (1). pp. 5-13. ISSN 0003-4878 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mef008

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Although it is well known that both cigarette smoke and microscopic airborne asbestos fibres can cause lung cancer, evidence as to how these two agents combine is nebulous. Many workers have believed in the multiplicative theory, whereby asbestos increases the risk in proportion to the risk from other causes. However, evidence against this theory is mounting: a recent review concluded that the multiplicative hypothesis was untenable, and that the relative risk of lung cancer from asbestos exposure was about twice as high in non-smokers as in smokers, a finding largely independent of type of asbestos fibre. The criteria for entry to the current study were met by 7279 men in the 1891-1920 birth cohort of Quebec chrysotile miners and millers. The data consisted of date of birth, place of employment, smoking habit, asbestos exposure accumulated to age 55 and, for those 5527 who died between 1950 and June 1992, date and cause of death; 533 of the deaths were from lung cancer. For the principal analyses, ex-smokers were excluded from the study cohort, which comprised 5888 men, of whom 473 died of lung cancer. The conventional form of analysis is simply of the double dichotomy: non-smokers of cigarettes, 'unexposed' and exposed; all others, 'unexposed' and exposed. The respective standardized lung cancer mortality ratios (SMRs) were 0.29 and 0.62; and 1.37 and 1.72. Thus, the differences in relative risk, due to exposure, were closely similar, 0.33 and 0.35. On the other hand, the effects of asbestos measured by the corresponding ratios, 2.12 and 1.25, did differ, being 1.7 times as high in non-smokers as in others. The principal analysis was much more penetrating: the method was to fit models to a 'disaggregated' 6 x 10 array, by smoking habit (excluding ex-smokers) and asbestos exposure, of lung cancer SMRs. Both linear and log-linear models were fitted: the former included the additive and linear-multiplicative; the latter embraced the more conventional multiplicative form. The additive model fitted much the best. The fit of each multiplicative model was improved by the introduction of an interaction term that implied a less than multiplicative relationship. Thus smoking and exposure to chrysotile appear to have acted independently in causing lung cancer, with 10 cigarettes a day having an effect roughly equivalent to exposure amounting to 700 million particles per cubic foot x years. The refutation of the multiplicative hypothesis in these data reinforces its inapplicability in general; but the additive hypothesis is not generally applicable either. Indeed, there seems to be no good reason to believe that interactions conform to any simple theory. The implications are important.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: additivity, chrysotile asbestos, cigarette smoke, combination, of effects, disaggregation, independent action, lung cancer, multiplicativity, relative asbestos effect, Quebec, synergy, index, 1891-1920 birth cohort, mortality, asbestos, synergy, Air Pollutants, Occupational, adverse effects, Asbestos, Serpentine, adverse effects, Causality, Cause of Death, Cohort Studies, Human, Lung Neoplasms, etiology, Male, Mining, Models, Statistical, Quebec, Risk Assessment, Smoking, adverse effects
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Social and Environmental Health Research
PubMed ID: 12005133
Web of Science ID: 173854300003
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/17153

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
330Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Impact and interest
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item