Evidence-based measurement - Which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation?


Hobart, JC; Lamping, DL; Freeman, JA; Langdon, DW; McLellan, DL; Greenwood, RJ; Thompson, AJ; (2001) Evidence-based measurement - Which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology, 57 (4). pp. 639-44. ISSN 0028-3878

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 10-item Barthel Index (BI), 18-item Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and 30-item Functional Independence Measure + Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM) as measures of disability outcomes for neurologic rehabilitation. METHODS: A total of 149 inpatients from two rehabilitation units in South England specializing in neurologic disorders were studied. Traditional psychometric methods were used to evaluate and compare acceptability (score distributions), reliability (internal consistency, intrarater reproducibility), validity (concurrent, convergent and discriminant construct), and responsiveness (standardized response mean). RESULTS: All three rating scales satisfied recommended criteria for reliable and valid measurement of disability, and are acceptable and responsive in this study sample. The FIM and FIM+FAM total scales are psychometrically similar measures of global disability. The BI, FIM, and FIM+FAM motor scales are psychometrically similar measures of physical disability. The FIM and FIM+FAM cognitive scales are psychometrically similar measures of physical disability. CONCLUSIONS: In the sample studied, the BI, FIM, FIM+FAM have similar measurement properties, when examined using traditional psychometric analyses. Although instruments with more items and item response categories generate more qualitative information about an outcome, they may not improve its measurement. Results highlight the importance of using recognized techniques of scale construction to develop health outcome measures.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Health-status instruments, item response theory, quality-of-, life, reliability, assumptions, agreement, tests, Adolescence, Adult, Aged, Disability Evaluation, Discriminant Analysis, Evidence-Based Medicine, methods, Female, Human, Male, Middle Age, Nervous System Diseases, psychology, rehabilitation, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), methods, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, statistics & numerical data, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Faculty and Department: Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Health Services Research and Policy
PubMed ID: 11524472
Web of Science ID: 170623900012
URI: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/16937

Statistics


Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads since deposit
0Downloads
381Hits
Accesses by country - last 12 months
Accesses by referrer - last 12 months
Additional statistics for this record are available via IRStats2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item