distinguished
implementation
london
potentially
gray
experts
pooling
medicine
shown
threshold
728
contribute
exercise
kappa
address
fair
project
sical
share
dent
option
death
conducting
giving
tween
appropriate
matter
dramatically
importance
people
identify
source
outcome
sufficient
lack
even
hyder8
gary
lund
understandable
challenges
involve
return
ameratunga4
serious
expose
edinburgh
better
jl
pbma
final
already
knowledge
inform
etc
deal
personal
audi
financing
table
timate
uncer
croat
exposure
vast
partner
lidity
mation
substantial
ology
burden
choosing
references
partly
real
set
country
4356
tial
could
shanthi
agement
allocate
coordination
research
terminate
90159
survey
both
liverability
ments
eventually
decisions
scenarios
s0168
00198
vaccine
rev
prior
mainly
programs
pass
compet
would
evant
is1
get
respected
global
hec
335
translating
justified
third
governments
black7
disease
ence
num
baltimore
erability
8510
avertable
afford
61242
approach
efficacy
elsewhere
answerability
sug
chnri
enter
igor
rather
mat
closely
sions
age
recommended
texts
scenar
ar
sm
adding
mental
petition
deci
results
want
globally
key
save
likelihood
tak
avail
generating
pediatrics
becoming
easiest
exist
right
necessary
729
funding
tem
zation
zulfiqar
hypothetical
investigated
detectable
davis
experience
individual
457
entire
who
fers
simple
editors
arifeen
ilona
pneumonia
continuously
techni
swerability
hill
realisti
envisage
lows
flisher
failure
factors
institutions
partnership
expected
consultations
calculation
advance
pre
never
categorize
action
many
e259
bur
utility
college
provide
way
categorized
ductions
campbell2
dark
fol
san
selecting
understanding
cipients
tsai17
kj
investment
focused
shows
losses
possibility
595
knowledgeable
flexibility
composition
melbourne
deliverability
account
little
recipients
inves
questions
md
uncertainty
say
ranked
increase
score
suggested
canada
doi
aids
possible
feedback
mitton
collective
taxpayers
split
cost
passed
preferences
framed
under
hygiene
our
decides
its
group
donaldson
intersectoral
tatives
accepted
managers
witnessing
compute
medical
soon
end
theory
miss
reach
satisfy
langley
funded
reliable
particular
implement
without
than
tomlinson
black8
effective
viii
department
clude
supervision
reduction
is2
living
effort
endless
c1
methodology
julie
paediatrics
countability
practice
order
arrow
following
tomlinson12
stocks
intend
after
controver
existent
perience
quantitative
paradoxes
grants
mona
allocated
interven
takes
agency
suf
assessment
sure
child
strongly
organizations
whole
new
evaluation
centre
org
entirely
maryland
limitations
respectively
needed
develop
holders
affordable
min
communication
conclusion
expensive
wide
examples
researchers
regions
scoring
variable
726
actual
rc
calls
donor
generated
1990
criteria
formative
audience
thresholds
exceed
actors
probability
trend
extensive
method
her
investing
external
any
define
more
subjects
strat
groups
detailed
most
offering
demonstrate
col
17760497
had
volved
delivered
normatively
finan
again
weights
relevant
much
neither
iii
left
assessing
fact
seen
shifted
upon
only
motivated
proposals
means
nario
requirements
thoroughly
ases
culation
odology
reasonable
ber
orities
disagree
lished
balanced
internation
epidemiol
represen
into
good
making
overlap
judge
provision
west
concern
systematic
max
ranks
ular
associated
listing
increasing
subjectivity
less
ternative
analysis
2189948
fixed
received
dv
calculating
next
almost
value
toward
contain
pete
restricting
meth
make
industry
quantified
themselves
august
bradshaw
harry
input
choose
individuals
affects
launched
attitudes
applied
some
function
advantages
graham
improvement
financial
sustainability
ones
biases
respect
non
against
xiv
avenues
carefully
society
benefits
needs
missing
launching
feasibility
methodologies
begin
improve
profit
cmj
likely
resources
irudan
positive
necessarily
fer
levels
strengths
com
behalf
remove
shift
mind
exercises
saving
product
ideas
patents
ties
gibson3
consider
lower
diarrhoea
specific
design
agencies
ter
interests
731
becomes
components
concept
infect
vance
corrected
ficiently
other
significance
term
odologies
allocation
733
university
informs
croatian
initiative
markets
another
shortcomings
target
kapiriri3
2008
scotland
vestors
thermore
cally
velop
ann
launch
merged
cicchetti
opinion
915
dhaka
choice
vaccines
increasingly
well
zealand
legitimacy
potential
australia
perts
stakehold
flict
pool
nutrition
influ
implementing
decide
divided
wider
sys
unbalanced
world
greatest
risks
ers
9ag
ideal
deciding
nal
yee
give
figure
mickey
annual
being
various
costs
derived
man
possibly
leroy
leads
cerns
may
operations
different
mea
terms
364
novel
dardizability
720
organi
marginal
lev
number
organization
managed
now
population
biased
100
column
how
bias
their
scale
best
attractiveness
therefore
having
ifying
included
equitable
trition
question
egy
curs
far
required
also
chisholm
distribution
related
lansang15
but
over
reaching
denominator
3325
envisaged
criterion
agreement
pub
prevent
improving
journalists
correspond
like
ranged
pref
receive
ave
fund
undertaken
include
unlikely
cut
papers
his
evidence
profits
easy
projects
opinions
based
fierce
jamaica
assigned
distribute
1371
teria
brown9
ables
depend
unit
made
priority
pri
field
erence
completion
posed
greater
such
fairness
assigning
equivalent
current
example
discussed
17182344
17948948
fun
730
assessed
adjusting
time
specifying
ment
publications
human
evaluating
framework
participate
732
cal
darmstadt8
mists
complex
imag
apparent
international
represent
has
xiii
2007
atically
achieve
pakistan
domain
useful
contributed
grant
sufficiently
ample
identifying
use
ensuring
ny
chandramohan10
appro
approaches
capacities
weighted
box
12745172
views
con
mentioned
aim
priorities
computation
cess
appropriately
randomized
establish
johns
bioethics
721
notion
scorers
mean
modifying
margaret
kit
suggestion
intuitive
releasing
range
collins
crite
cial
effect
search
perspective
618
gives
abstract
major
issues
place
teviot
above
help
competition
porter
resolving
jennifer
thinks
competitiveness
eh8
mortal
serve
722
practical
previous
regional
reduce
figures
placed
setting
goal
kosek8
check
c5
context
supported
there
uncertainties
keeping
regardless
market
transferabili
south
gibson
hopkins
damentally
provides
claudio
computing
medline
measuring
certain
te2
organiza
amount
dis
shams
inter
systematically
few
government
authors
politi
york
visions
arifeen5
should
allocating
selected
seek
usefulness
ity
fine
products
interest
w2
poor
answered
clinical
think
chopra
subtracting
bertozzi
proposed
off
diversified
known
differences
affordability
additional
ham
prise
correspondence
feinstein
reworded
cri
numerator
answerable
infrastructure
604
result
likeli
text
suffi
imal
need
does
per
performed
process
computed
infor
center
trials
working
nossal
karachi
sensitive
statistics
program
although
important
presents
comparison
all
2006
systems
relate
linking
total
ences
development
limitation
support
submit
factor
sue
endpoints
sciences
itself
2105
multiplied
thornicroft
malaria
nical
gains
black
agree
institutional
transport
structured
budget
below
s0140
greatly
ministry
mod
cases
chosen
equally
cape
recently
duration
depth
identifies
call
specify
discriminate
items
vii
17194855
portfolio
relative
details
howev
neutral
auckland
croatia
childhood
inclusion
revise
designed
easily
biggest
hotmail
efficacious
alexander
they
optimism
definition
journals
popula
ority
rational
meaningful
validation
70687
mcgraw
aj
aa
rpss
region
according
rationing
options
ships
joint
suggest
novelty
defining
ini
lective
media
scored
plos
submitted
questionnaire
main
basic
discussing
alternative
substantially
effects
suggestions
categorization
simon
life
te1
moment
analogies
system
lind
complies
every
intermediate
invite
national
aversion
ma
policy
lawn16
avenue
addition
chan11
risk
care
isn
addressed
explain
rank
highly
on
723
cr
measured
benefit
study
accessible
fundamental
outcomes
california
climate
case
respon
deaths
effectively
exposes
about
defined
stressed
prove
lima
jp
exceeds
uninterrupted
pected
formed
hood
technical
own
ting
monitoring
improved
obtaining
pelto
truly
rel
clas
vestments
returns
competing
donors
impact
achieved
run
atic
answer
lucrative
please
prevalence
independently
med
added
remains
underprivileged
ease
provided
large
judged
relatively
lawyers
provement
lydia
attempt
nation
types
umn
long
deliverable
elbasha
aga
hess9
measure
initial
harper
central
presentation
seems
tion
inequity
several
adnan
gardner13
chose
lead
record
campbell
tend
prof
feel
favorable
scenario
whose
council
dalys
gested
discussion
challenging
imaginable
kenneth
2005
searchers
aims
1241
second
rudan
disability
advocacy
fall
sustainable
work
psychiatric
portions
bhutta6
inequities
conducted
083287
ways
whether
pro
possess
three
reference
sever
settings
mix
was
solicit
ply
mathematical
two
transla
arbitrary
jointly
each
africa
chopra12
nues
assess
progress
tropical
weight
habicht
leverage
priate
countries
heterogeneous
stock
identification
reality
finished
half
17804059
limit
available
khan
revising
3099
however
qualify
testing
determinant
sum
one
minimum
tain
decision
allowed
robert
year
usa
budgeting
s1473
among
considered
imizing
fore
transparent
rion
approval
ical
proportion
addressing
private
light
listed
termediate
title
still
cover
preference
will
average
accounted
priori
future
sample
cause
very
usually
stan
problem
expertise
avoid
recoded
exactly
eh
tical
indeed
pos
demand
journal
ratio
ajph
then
coverage
governmental
6736
sonja
comput
prioritized
direct
signing
involving
facilities
civil
feasible
independent
nutri
quality
724
reflect
thus
15386661
difficulty
francisco
adequacy
changes
areas
same
rating
free
situations
saxena
jayne
allow
favoring
larger
others
0895
here
webster10
lancet
caribbean
aspects
weaknesses
pmed
equi
den
given
ensure
sanders
lansang
sible
17948946
article
link
bloomberg
partic
between
space
lives
peru
sce
put
lawn
clin
fail
acceptable
stantially
expert
indepen
though
enable
contexts
investments
727
philippines
inde
investors
communi
hendricks
www
public
taking
children
theoretically
beliefs
problems
exceeding
accord
meeks
performing
must
checking
able
companies
using
interpreting
single
justify
since
advantage
gap
pend
ing
ethics
ever
cussing
literature
cisions
always
prioritization
agers
limited
dentistry
within
obtained
points
deliv
cousens10
obtain
ready
generate
select
track
because
prefer
bank
level
patel
asked
hypothetically
ble
faculty
uk
done
swers
carneiro10
makers
newborn
greenfield
idea
management
complicated
decrease
guidelines
1016
219
deals
equal
joy
bangladesh
broad
delivery
equals
rudan1
longer
scores
them
used
steps
users
disqualified
considerable
nor
press
w1
when
responsible
ciently
argue
challenge
translation
tech
re
explore
enforcement
investor
ii
flects
reveal
conduct
0040259
yes
further
base
change
econ
november
developing
influence
called
institute
acknowledgment
w5
ca
initially
domains
mary
1002
toronto
370
sev
is5
regulation
step
ported
skipped
revision
ters
unknown
promising
tors
familiar
possi
adjusted
capacity
lanata14
point
performance
eral
reviewer
specified
small
found
limits
diverse
enables
exposed
sup
te3
low
nearly
arithmetic
contest
aver
across
through
while
theoretical
funds
take
ques
developed
scor
forum
ination
school
725
finally
suffer
try
blanks
circumstances
tions
read
stake
once
translated
persisting
strategy
purpose
inherent
instances
successful
statis
concluding
present
intervention
see
intermedi
maureen
recommends
ria
mediate
satis
ate
preferenc
rps
manila
either
common
health
paragraph
xii
review
1970
duce
fulness
correct
comparing
values
general
maximum
informative
flexible
five
task
commits
ultimate
concerns
disorders
hyder
propose
list
out
seem
leave
stage
size
extremely
prioritizing
choos
invest
velopment
categories
side
town
servations
blank
enough
raise
lines
safety
econo
controversy
chance
indies
simply
551
learn
involvement
transparency
existing
require
lessons
ethical
intelligent
starting
spects
us
interventions
highest
cannot
not
mark
years
fur
spectrum
kapiriri
determinants
principles
effectiveness
redefined
remain
equity
informed
selection
daniel
services
reduced
implies
demands
stakeholders
standard
community
before
answers
success
represents
privileged
persons
team
responsiveness
high
first
overall
sub
structure
2003