Neonatal infection with G10P[11] rotavirus did not confer protection against subsequent rotavirus infection in a community cohort in Vellore, South India.
Banerjee, Indrani;
Gladstone, Beryl Primrose;
Le Fevre, Andrea M;
Ramani, Sasirekha;
Iturriza-Gomara, Miren;
Gray, James J;
Brown, David W;
Estes, Mary K;
Muliyil, Jaya Prakash;
Jaffar, Shabbar;
+1 more...Kang, Gagandeep;
(2007)
Neonatal infection with G10P[11] rotavirus did not confer protection against subsequent rotavirus infection in a community cohort in Vellore, South India.
The Journal of infectious diseases, 195 (5).
pp. 625-632.
ISSN 0022-1899
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/510853
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
BACKGROUND: Various observational studies have suggested that neonatal rotavirus infection confers protection against diarrhea due to subsequent rotavirus infection. We examined the incidence of rotavirus infection and diarrhea during the first 2 years of life among children infected with the G10P[11] rotavirus strain during the neonatal period and those not infected with rotavirus. METHODS: Children were recruited at birth and were followed up at least twice weekly. Stool samples, collected every 2 weeks for surveillance and at each episode of diarrhea, were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Among 33 children infected neonatally with G10P[11] and 300 children not infected with rotavirus, there was no significant difference in the rates of rotavirus-positive diarrhea (rate ratio [RR], 1.05 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-1.79]), moderate or severe rotavirus-positive diarrhea (RR, 1.42 [95% CI, 0.73-2.78]), or asymptomatic rotavirus shedding (RR, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.85-1.83]). CONCLUSION: Neonatal G10P[11] infection with a strain resembling a vaccine candidate did not confer protection against subsequent rotavirus infection or diarrhea of any severity in this setting.