Comparison of cervicovaginal lavage, cervicovaginal lavage enriched with cervical swab, and vaginal tampon for the detection of HIV-1 RNA and HSV-2 DNA in genital secretions.
Delany, Sinéad;
Rosas, Raul;
Mlaba, Nonkululeko;
Clayton, Tim;
Akpomiemie, Godspower;
LeGoff, Jérôme;
Capovilla, Alexio;
Bélec, Laurent;
Stevens, Wendy;
Mayaud, Philippe;
(2008)
Comparison of cervicovaginal lavage, cervicovaginal lavage enriched with cervical swab, and vaginal tampon for the detection of HIV-1 RNA and HSV-2 DNA in genital secretions.
Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 49 (4).
pp. 406-409.
ISSN 1525-4135
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/qai.0b013e31818c7f75
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
METHODS: We compared the performance of 3 collection methods for cervicovaginal secretions [cervicovaginal lavage (CVL), CVL enriched with a cervical swab (eCVL), and vaginal tampon (VT)] to identify the most reliable method for detection of cervicovaginal HIV-1 and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2). HIV-1 RNA (Nuclisens EasyQ; BioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France), HSV-2 DNA (real-time polymerase chain reaction), and microscopic blood and semen traces were detected in samples from 19 HIV-1-HSV-2-coinfected women seen at 4 weekly visits. RESULTS: HIV-1 RNA was detected in 49 (79%) of 62 eCVLs, 41 (61%) of 67 CVLs, and 27 (57%) of 47 VTs. Detection of HIV-1 RNA was higher in eCVL compared with CVL [45/58 (78%) vs. 32/58 (55%); risk ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.88]. CONCLUSIONS: Although more eCVLs were contaminated with microscopic blood (29%) than CVLs (22%) or VTs (7%), detection of HIV-1 RNA remained higher using eCVL compared with CVL (risk ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 2.02) in uncontaminated samples. HSV-2 DNA was detected in less than 10% of samples by each method but in 7 (37%) of 19 women overall by 1 or more methods.
