Geographical Differences in SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response Dynamics and Neutralisation Profiles to Mild COVID-19: Lessons from a UK–Uganda Comparison

Background: The global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic revealed stark variability in clinical outcomes across populations, underscoring the need for region-tailored vaccination strategies. To inform standardised global immunisation efforts, this study compared longitudinal binding antibody responses and neutralisation capacities in mild COVID-19 cases from Uganda and the United Kingdom (UK).

Methods: IgG responses to spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins, along with IgM responses to S and receptor-binding domain (RBD) proteins, were assessed in 29 Ugandan and 14 UK participants over 84 and 82 days, respectively. Antibody levels were quantified using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), alongside pseudovirus neutralisation assays targeting the D614G variant.

Results: Ugandan participants exhibited higher early IgG and IgM levels, particularly against spike and RBD, with a rapid onset of responses that waned quickly. UK participants showed a slower but sustained increase in IgG and IgM levels. Neutralisation titres revealed elevated responses in 16.4% of Ugandan participants (>2000) compared to 4.5% of UK participants, suggesting a greater sensitivity to viral neutralisation. Conversely, 31.8% of UK participants exhibited low titres (<25) compared to 14.8% of Ugandan participants, indicating differences in resistance mechanisms. Neutralisation correlated strongly with spike and receptor-binding domain IgG in the UK cohort but showed weaker correlations in Ugandan participants.

Conclusions: These findings highlight distinct population-level immune responses, suggesting that geographic factors shaped the quality and durability of SARS-CoV-2 immunity. Tailored vaccination strategies are essential to optimise immunity across diverse populations and improve global epidemic preparedness.