Effectiveness of peer support for people with severe mental health conditions in high-, middle- and low-income countries: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Puschner, BerndORCID logo; Nakku, JulietORCID logo; Hiltensperger, RamonaORCID logo; Wolf, PhilipORCID logo; Adler Ben-Dor, InbarORCID logo; Bugeiga, Faith; Charles, AshleighORCID logo; Gai Meir, LionORCID logo; Garber-Epstein, PaulaORCID logo; Goldfarb, YaelORCID logo; +34 more...Grayzman, AlinaORCID logo; Hadas-Grundman, Shimri; Haun, MariaORCID logo; Heuer, ImkeORCID logo; Iboma, Bahati; Kalha, JasmineORCID logo; Kamwaga, Lydia; Korde, PalakORCID logo; Kotera, YasuhiroORCID logo; Krumm, SilviaORCID logo; Kulkarni, ArtiORCID logo; Kwebiiha, Eric; Kyara, Jennifer; Lachman, MaxORCID logo; Mahlke, CandelariaORCID logo; Mayer, BenjaminORCID logo; Moran, GaliaORCID logo; Mpango, RichardORCID logo; Mtei, Rachel; Müller-Stierlin, AnnabelORCID logo; Nanyonga, Roseline; Ngakongwa, FileukaORCID logo; Niwemuhwezi, Jackline; Nixdorf, RebeccaORCID logo; Nugent, Lena; Pathare, SoumitraORCID logo; Ramesh, Mary; Ryan, GraceORCID logo; Schulz, Gwen; Wagner, Maria; Waldmann, TamaraORCID logo; Wenzel, LisaORCID logo; Shamba, DonatORCID logo; and Slade, MikeORCID logo (2025) Effectiveness of peer support for people with severe mental health conditions in high-, middle- and low-income countries: multicentre randomised controlled trial. The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science. pp. 1-9. ISSN 0007-1250 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2025.10299
Copy

BACKGROUND: Some trials have evaluated peer support for people with mental ill health in high-income, mainly English-speaking countries, but the quality of the evidence is weak. AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of UPSIDES peer support in high-, middle- and low-income countries. METHOD: This pragmatic multicentre parallel-group wait-list randomised controlled trial (registration: ISRCTN26008944) with three measurement points (baseline and 4 and 8 months) took place at six study sites: two in Germany, and one each in Uganda, Tanzania, Israel and India. Participants were adults with long-standing severe mental health conditions. Outcomes were improvements in social inclusion (primary) and empowerment, hope, recovery, health and social functioning (secondary). Participants allocated to the intervention group were offered UPSIDES peer support. RESULTS: Of the 615 participants (305 intervention group), 337 (54.8%) identified as women. The average age was 38.3 (s.d. = 11.2) years, and the mean illness duration was 14.9 (s.d. = 38.4) years. Those allocated to the intervention group received 6.9 (s.d. = 4.2) peer support sessions on average. Intention-to-treat analysis showed effects on two of the three subscales of the Social Inclusion Scale, Empowerment Scale and HOPE Scale. Per-protocol analysis with participants who had received three or more intervention sessions also showed an effect on the Social Inclusion Scale total score (β = 0.18, P = 0.031, 95% CI: 0.02-0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Peer support has beneficial impacts on social inclusion, empowerment and hope among people with severe mental health conditions across diverse settings. As social isolation is a key driver of mental ill health, and empowerment and hope are both crucial for recovery, peer support can be recommended as an effective component of mental healthcare. Peer support has the potential to move global mental health closer towards a recovery- and rights-based orientation.


picture_as_pdf
Puschner-etal-2025-Effectiveness-of-peer-support-for-people-with-severe.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads