Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the Hospital to Home discharge and follow-up programme in rural Uganda: a mixed-methods intervention study.

Beatrice Niyonshaba ; Daniel Kabugo ; Cornety Nakiganda ; Christine Otai ; Margret Seela ; Joyce Nankabala ; James Nyonyintono ; Josephine Nakakande ; Tadeo Kigozi ; Madeline Vaughan ; +8 more... Heidi Nakamura ORCID logo ; Mohan Paudel ; Kimber Haddix-McKay ; Benjamin JS Al-Haddad ORCID logo ; Cally J Tann ORCID logo ; Paul Mubiri ; Peter Waiswa ; Brooke Magnusson ORCID logo ; (2025) Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the Hospital to Home discharge and follow-up programme in rural Uganda: a mixed-methods intervention study. BMJ global health, 10 (2). e015945-e015945. ISSN 2059-7908 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015945
Copy

INTRODUCTION: Over 60% of premature infants are born in Africa or South Asia. Infants born early, small or who become sick after birth have a higher risk of death, poor growth and developmental impairments. Innovative interventions tailored for low- and middle-income countries are essential to help these newborns survive and develop optimally. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of Hospital to Home (H2H), a discharge and follow-up programme for small and sick newborns in rural Uganda. METHODS: We compared two cohorts of high-risk hospitalised neonates in Uganda: a historical-comparison cohort receiving standard facility-based care and an intervention cohort that received the H2H programme, a hospital and community spanning package of interventions designed to improve neurodevelopmental outcomes. We compared 6-month corrected neurodevelopmental, growth, nutritional and vaccination outcomes between the cohorts complemented by qualitative interviews of caregivers, community health workers and health facility staff. RESULTS: We recruited 191 participants: 91 historical-comparison cohort (born between July and September 2018), and 100 intervention cohort (born July 2019 to February 2020). No statistically significant difference was seen in neurodevelopmental outcomes (adjusted OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.46). Improved vaccination completion (88.5% intervention vs 76.9% comparison, p=0.041), and exclusive breastfeeding rates (42% vs 6.6%, p<0.001) were seen. Caregivers and healthcare workers reported the intervention to be acceptable and feasible in this rural Ugandan setting. CONCLUSION: The H2H programme was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and healthcare providers. Improved vaccination and exclusive breastfeeding rates were seen in the intervention group when compared with a historical comparison cohort in this rural Ugandan setting. Further investigation on the short and long-term effectiveness of the H2H programme in a government health services setting is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN51636372.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
Niyonshaba-etal-2025-Feasibility-acceptability-and-preliminary-effectiveness-of-the-Hospital-to-Home-discharge-and-follow-up-programme-in-rural-Uganda.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads