A multi-country mixed method evaluation of the HERA (Healthcare Responding to Domestic Violence and Abuse) intervention: A comparative analysis

Loraine J Bacchus ORCID logo ; Stephanie Pereira ; Nagham Joudeh ; Beatriz Diniz Kalichman ; Samita K.C. ; Prabhash Siriwardhana ; Tharuka Silva ; Ana Flavia Pires Lucas d’Oliveira ; Poonam Rishal ; Satya Shrestha ; +8 more... Lilia Blima Schraiber ; Abdulsalam Alkaiyat ; Thilini Rajapakse ; Amira Shaheen ; Gene Feder ; Helen Lambert ; Claudia Garcia Moreno ; Manuela Colombini ORCID logo ; (2025) A multi-country mixed method evaluation of the HERA (Healthcare Responding to Domestic Violence and Abuse) intervention: A comparative analysis. SSM - health systems, 4. p. 100042. ISSN 2949-8562 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100042
Copy

Background: Domestic violence (DV) against women has adverse health consequences and demands a comprehensive healthcare response. Interventions adapted from high-income countries encounter implementation challenges in low-and-middle-income countries, due to diverse socio-cultural, political and economic contexts. This study explored HERA (Healthcare Responding to Violence and Abuse) implementation, that aimed to strengthen the healthcare response to DV in Brazil, Nepal, the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt), and Sri Lanka. Methods: Parallel mixed method study (2019 – 2022). Quantitative data included the Provider Intervention Measure (PIM), training attendance records and DV documentation before and after the intervention. Qualitative data included semi-structured interviews with providers and DV survivors, field notes and stakeholder meetings. Data were integrated at the level of interpretation and reporting using a narrative approach, drawing on theories of Complex Adaptive Systems and sensemaking. Results: HERA enhanced healthcare provider readiness to address DV and fostered a women-centred approach. The interaction between HERA and the diverse contexts impacted the reciprocal relationship between sensemaking and sensegiving within health systems, leading to adaptive behaviours among providers and women. This included mediation practices, negotiating DV documentation, modified roles, and containment of DV cases within the clinic. Normative gender roles, normalised DV attitudes, biomedical sensemaking frameworks, community violence, austerity policies, scarce resources, and weak leadership and management support affected implementation success. Conclusion: It is important to consider the interplay between context and intervention goals during development, implementation and evaluation of health system responses to DV. Managers require specific intervention components to support organisational change. Culturally appropriate support for women should acknowledge limitations to their agency.

picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
Bacchus-etal-2025-A-multi-country-mixed-method-evaluation-of-the-HERA-intervention.pdf
subject
Published Version

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads