Depression follow-up monitoring with the PHQ-9: an open cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Tony Kendrick ORCID logo ; Christopher Dowrick ORCID logo ; Glyn Lewis ORCID logo ; Michael Moore ORCID logo ; Geraldine M Leydon ORCID logo ; Adam Wa Geraghty ORCID logo ; Gareth Griffiths ORCID logo ; Shihua Zhu ORCID logo ; Guiqing Lily Yao ORCID logo ; Carl May ORCID logo ; +19 more... Mark Gabbay ORCID logo ; Rachel Dewar-Haggart ORCID logo ; Samantha Williams ORCID logo ; Lien Bui ORCID logo ; Natalie Thompson ORCID logo ; Lauren Bridewell ORCID logo ; Emilia Trapasso ORCID logo ; Tasneem Patel ORCID logo ; Molly McCarthy ORCID logo ; Naila Khan ORCID logo ; Helen Page ORCID logo ; Emma Corcoran ORCID logo ; Jane Sungmin Hahn ORCID logo ; Molly Bird ORCID logo ; Mekeda X Logan ORCID logo ; Brian Chi Fung Ching ORCID logo ; Riya Tiwari ORCID logo ; Anna Hunt ORCID logo ; Beth Stuart ORCID logo ; (2024) Depression follow-up monitoring with the PHQ-9: an open cluster-randomised controlled trial. British journal of general practice, 74 (744). e456-e465. ISSN 0960-1643 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0539
Copy

Background Outcome monitoring of depression treatment is recommended but there is a lack of evidence on patient benefit in primary care. Aim To test monitoring depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) with patient feedback. Design and setting An open cluster-randomised controlled trial was undertaken in 141 group practices. Method Adults with new depressive episodes were recruited through record searches and opportunistically. The exclusion criteria were as follows: dementia; psychosis; substance misuse; and suicide risk. The PHQ-9 was administered soon after diagnosis, and 10-35 days later. The primary outcome was the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) score at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were as follows: BDI-II at 26 weeks; Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) and EuroQol EQ-5D-5L quality of life at 12 and 26 weeks; antidepressant treatment; mental health and social service contacts; adverse events, and Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS) over 26 weeks. Results In total, 302 patients were recruited to the intervention arm and 227 to the controls. At 12 weeks, 254 (84.1%) and 199 (87.7%) were followed-up, respectively. Only 40.9% of patients in the intervention had a GP follow-up PHQ-9 recorded. There was no significant difference in BDI-II score at 12 weeks (mean difference -0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.16 to 1.26; adjusted for baseline depression, baseline anxiety, sociodemographic factors, and clustering by practice). EQ-5D-5L quality-of-life scores were higher in the intervention arm at 26 weeks (adjusted mean difference 0.053; 95% CI = 0.013 to 0.093. A clinically significant difference in depression at 26 weeks could not be ruled out. No significant differences were found in social functioning, adverse events, or satisfaction. In a per-protocol analysis, antidepressant use and mental health contacts were significantly greater in patients in the intervention arm with a recorded follow-up PHQ-9 (<i>P</i> = 0.025 and <i>P</i> = 0.010, respectively). Conclusion< No evidence was found of improved depression outcome at 12 weeks from monitoring. The findings of possible benefits over 26 weeks warrant replication, investigating possible mechanisms, preferably with automated delivery of monitoring and more instructive feedback.


picture_as_pdf
Kendrick-etal-2024-Depression-follow-up-monitoring-with-the-PHQ-9.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads