Doukani, A; (2024) A mixed methods evaluation of the working alliance in a blended cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for depression in a multinational randomised controlled trial in Europe. PhD thesis, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17037/PUBS.04674822
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
The client and therapist working alliance is widely considered as an important predictor of positive outcomes in face-to-face psychological therapies, but little is known about this concept in blended cognitive behavioural therapy (b-CBT) involving a digital programme and face-to-face sessions. My thesis evaluated the working alliance from client and therapist perspectives in b-CBT and when compared to face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression in Europe. My thesis was nested in a clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of different formats of b-CBT compared to usual care, for adults with depression in nine European countries. A mixed methods approach was adopted. Semi-structured interviews qualitatively explored client and therapist experiences of the working alliance in b-CBT in the UK. Secondary analysis of a subset of pooled data evaluated client (n=676) and therapist (n=616) working alliance scores using linear regression models to test the difference between b-CBT versus face-to-face CBT; determine if working alliance scores are associated with depression scores in b-CBT; and if programme system usability scores influence this association in b-CBT 3-months post-randomisation. Client qualitative interviews (n=19) found a new working alliance dimension called ‘digital heuristics’, defined as a digital programmes’ promotion of active engagement, self-discovery, and autonomous problem-solving. Therapist qualitative interviews (n=13) outlined barriers and facilitators to fostering the working alliance in relation to experiences of time in b-CBT, the functionality of the digital programme, ability to tailor b-CBT, and confidence in delivering b-CBT. Quantitative findings showed that working alliance scores were significantly higher in b-CBT compared to face-to-face CBT for client but not therapist scores. In b-CBT, higher client and therapist working alliance scores were associated with improvements in client depression scores, and were influenced by programme usability scores. Collectively my thesis shows that b-CBT may enhance the quality of the working alliance when compared to face-to-face CBT. The digital programme should therefore be considered when assessing the working alliance in b-CBT for depression.
Item Type | Thesis |
---|---|
Thesis Type | Doctoral |
Thesis Name | PhD |
Contributors | Kakuma, R; Free, C and Araya, R |
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Population Health (2012- ) |
Research Centre | Centre for Global Mental Health |
Copyright Holders | Asmae Doukani |
Downloads
Filename: 2024_EPH_PhD_Doukani_A_Redacted.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
DownloadRestricted to: Repository staff only
Filename: 2024_EPH_PhD_Doukani_A.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0