Aetiology and Potential Animal Exposure in Central Nervous System Infections in Vietnam.

Hannah E Brindle ORCID logo ; Behzad Nadjm ORCID logo ; Marc Choisy ; Rob Christley ; Michael Griffiths ; Stephen Baker ; Juliet E Bryant ; James I Campbell ; Van Vinh Chau Nguyen ; Thi Ngoc Diep Nguyen ; +18 more... Ty Thi Hang Vu ; Van Hung Nguyen ; Bao Long Hoang ; Xuan Luat Le ; Ha My Pham ; Thi Dieu Ngan Ta ; Dang Trung Nghia Ho ; Thua Nguyen Tran ; Thi Han Ny Nguyen ; My Phuc Tran ; Thi Hong Phuong Pham ; Van Tan Le ; Dac Thuan Nguyen ; Thi Thu Trang Hau ; Ngoc Vinh Nguyen ; Heiman FL Wertheim ; Guy E Thwaites ; H Rogier van Doorn ; (2022) Aetiology and Potential Animal Exposure in Central Nervous System Infections in Vietnam. EcoHealth, 19 (4). pp. 463-474. ISSN 1612-9202 DOI: 10.1007/s10393-022-01611-w
Copy

An estimated 73% of emerging infections are zoonotic in origin, with animal contact and encroachment on their habitats increasing the risk of spill-over events. In Vietnam, close exposure to a wide range of animals and animal products can lead to acquisition of zoonotic pathogens, a number of which cause central nervous system (CNS) infections. However, studies show the aetiology of CNS infections remains unknown in around half of cases. We used samples and data from hospitalised patients with CNS infections, enrolled into the Vietnam Initiative on Zoonotic Infections multicentre study, to determine the association between aetiology and animal contact including those in whom the cause was unknown. Among 933 patients, a pathogen or an antibody response to it was identified in 291 (31.2%, 95% CI 28.3-34.3%). The most common pathogens were Streptococcus suis (n = 91 (9.8%, 8.0-11.9%)) and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) (n = 72 (7.7%, 6.1-9.7%)). Commonly reported animal contact included keeping, raising or handling (n = 364 (39.0%, 35.9-42.2%)) and handling, cooking or consuming raw meat, blood or viscera in the 2 weeks prior to symptom onset (n = 371 (39.8%, 36.6-43.0%)), with the latter most commonly from pigs (n = 343 (36.9%, 33.8-40.1%). There was no association between an unknown aetiology and exposure to animals in a multivariate logistic regression. Further testing for unknown or undetected pathogens may increase diagnostic yield, however, given the high proportion of zoonotic pathogens and the presence of risk factors, increasing public awareness about zoonoses and preventive measures can be considered.


picture_as_pdf
Brindle-etal-2022-Aetiology-and-Potential-Animal-Exposure.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads