The validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of a modified Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI-2) as a tool for serial measurements of health enablement.

Laura Elizabeth Bedford ORCID logo ; Maegan Hon Yan Yeung ORCID logo ; Chi Ho Au ORCID logo ; Emily Tsui Yee Tse ORCID logo ; Wing Yee Yim ; Esther Yee Tak Yu ORCID logo ; Carlos King Ho Wong ORCID logo ; Cindy Lo Kuen Lam ORCID logo ; (2021) The validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of a modified Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI-2) as a tool for serial measurements of health enablement. Family practice, 38 (3). pp. 339-345. ISSN 0263-2136 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa102
Copy

BACKGROUND: Patient enablement is a core tenet of patient-centred and holistic primary care. The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a transitional measure limited in its ability to measure changes over time. A modified version, PEI-2, has been developed to measure enablement at a given time-point without comparison to a recalled baseline. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of PEI-2. METHODS: PEI-2 was modified from the Chinese PEI to assess enablement over 4 weeks in a prospective cohort study nested within a community support programme [Trekkers Family Enhancement Scheme (TFES)] in Hong Kong. Construct validity was assessed by factor analysis and convergent validity by Spearman's correlations with health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation (ICC), responsiveness by 12-24-month change in PEI-2 score and sensitivity by differences in change of PEI-2 score between TFES participants and a control group. RESULTS: PEI-2 demonstrated construct validity with all items loading on one factor (factor loadings >0.7). Convergent validity was confirmed by significant correlations with 12-item Short Form Questionnaire, version 2 (r = 0.1089-0.1919) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (r = -0.2030). Internal reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.9095) and test-retest reliability moderate (ICC = 0.520, P = 0.506). Significant improvements in PEI-2 scores among the TFES group suggested good responsiveness (P < 0.001). The difference in change of PEI-2 scores between TFES and control was significant (P = 0.008), indicating good sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the validity, reliability, sensitivity and responsiveness of PEI-2 in measuring changes in enablement, making it a promising tool for evaluating enablement in cohort and intervention studies.


picture_as_pdf
Bedford-etal-2020-The-validity-reliability-sensitivity-and-responsiveness-of-a-modified-Patient-Enablement-Instrument-PEI-2-as-a-tool-for-serial-measurements-of-health-enablement.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads