What cut-off(s) to use with the Washington Group short set of questions?

Jill Hanass-Hancock ; Sureshkumar Kamalakannan ; GVS Murthy ORCID logo ; Michael Palmer ; Monica Pinilla-Roncancio ; Minerva Rivas Velarde ; Shailaja Tetali ; Sophie Mitra ; (2023) What cut-off(s) to use with the Washington Group short set of questions? Disability and health journal, 16 (4). 101499-. ISSN 1936-6574 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101499
Copy

The Washington Group short set (WG-SS) questions are increasingly integrated into national household surveys, censuses, and international survey programs. They enable the monitoring of disability rights and the production of internationally comparable statistics. Disability statistics on prevalence and inequalities can be estimated using different cut-offs on the degree of functional difficulties based on the WG-SS. This commentary discusses what cut-offs to adopt for the purpose of investigating and monitoring disability gaps. We recommend a three-way disaggregation comparing persons with (a) no difficulty, (b) some difficulty and (c) a lot of difficulty or unable to do. In cases where sample sizes are small for disaggregated analysis, we recommend comparing persons with no difficulty to persons with any level of difficulty (i.e. persons with any disability).


picture_as_pdf
Hanass-etal-2023-What-cut-off-s-to.pdf
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads