IHPBA-APHPBA International Study Group of Gallbladder Cancer; Palepu, Jagannath; Endo, Itaru; Chaudhari, Vikram Anil; Murthy, GVS; Chaudhuri, Sirshendu; Adam, Rene; Smith, Martin; de Reuver, Philip R; Lendoire, Javier; +39 more... Shrikhande, Shailesh V; De Aretxabala, Xabier; Sirohi, Bhawna; Kokudo, Norihiro; Kwon, Wooil; Pal, Sujoy; Bouzid, Chafik; Dixon, Elijah; Shah, Sudeep Rohit; Maroni, Rodrigo; Nervi, Bruno; Mengoa, Claudio; Patil, Shekhar; Ebata, Tomoki; Maithel, Shishir K; Lang, Hauke; Primrose, John; Hirano, Satoshi; Guevara, Oscar A; Ohtsuka, Masayuki; Valle, Juan W; Sharma, Atul; Nagarajan, Ganesh; Núñez Ju, Juan Jose; Arroyo, Gerardo Francisco; Torrez, Sergio Lopez; Erdmann, Joris Ivo; Butte, Jean M; Furuse, Junji; Lee, Seung Eun; Gomes, António Pedro; Park, Sang-Jae; Jang, Jin-Young; Oddi, Ricardo; Barreto, Savio George; Kijima, Hiroshi; Ciacio, Oriana; Gowda, Nagesh S; Jarnagin, William; (2024) 'IHPBA-APHPBA clinical practice guidelines': international Delphi consensus recommendations for gallbladder cancer. HPB, 26 (11). pp. 1311-1326. ISSN 1365-182X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.411
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Delphi consensus study was carried out under the auspices of the International and Asia-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Associations (IHPBA-APHPBA) to develop practice guidelines for management of gallbladder cancer (GBC) globally. METHOD: GBC experts from 17 countries, spanning 6 continents, participated in a hybrid four-round Delphi consensus development process. The methodology involved email, online consultations, and in-person discussions. Sixty eight clinical questions (CQs) covering various domains related to GBC, were administered to the experts. A consensus recommendation was accepted only when endorsed by more than 75% of the participating experts. RESULTS: Out of the sixty experts invited initially to participate in the consensus process 45 (75%) responded to the invitation. The consensus was achieved in 92.6% (63/68) of the CQs. Consensus covers epidemiological aspects of GBC, early, incidental and advanced GBC management, definitions for radical GBC resections, the extent of liver resection, lymph node dissection, and definitions of borderline resectable and locally advanced GBC. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first international Delphi consensus on GBC. These recommendations provide uniform terminology and practical clinical guidelines on the current management of GBC. Unresolved contentious issues like borderline resectable/locally advanced GBC need to be addressed by future clinical studies.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases > Dept of Clinical Research |
PubMed ID | 39191539 |
Elements ID | 228239 |
Official URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.411 |
Download
Filename: Consensus Manuscript Final Draft 5.5.2024.pdf
Description: This is an author accepted manuscript version of an article accepted for publication, and following peer review. Please be aware that minor differences may exist between this version and the final version if you wish to cite from it.
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Download