Improving the Validity of Non-Interventional Comparative Effectiveness Research by Basing Study Design on a Specified Existing Randomised Controlled Trial.

Kevin Wing ; Clémence Leyrat ORCID logo ; (2024) Improving the Validity of Non-Interventional Comparative Effectiveness Research by Basing Study Design on a Specified Existing Randomised Controlled Trial. American Journal of Epidemiology, 194 (4). pp. 913-917. ISSN 0002-9262 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwae317
Copy

This issue of AJE includes three articles (two reporting original analyses and one systematic review) in which non-interventional studies used an existing randomized controlled trial (RCT) as a reference standard to both inform non-interventional study design, and to benchmark results against. This commentary provides a brief background on the challenges of non-interventional comparative effectiveness research, before elaborating on (i) the potential benefits and challenges of basing non-interventional study design on a specified existing RCT, and (ii) the distinction between designing analysis based upon a specified existing RCT and studies based solely upon a hypothetical target trial. Finally, a number of recommendations for the conduct and reporting of non-interventional studies based upon existing RCTs are provided.

visibility_off picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
Wing-Leyrat-2024-Improving-the-validity-of-non.pdf
subject
Accepted Version
lock_clock
Restricted to Repository staff only until 5 September 2025
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0

Request Copy

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads