A qualitative evaluation of the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR) in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations
Kakuma, Ritsuko;
Cajethan, Onah Uchenna;
Shawyer, Frances;
Edan, Vrinda;
Wilson-Evered, Elisabeth;
Meadows, Graham;
Brophy, Lisa;
(2024)
A qualitative evaluation of the questionnaire about the process of recovery (QPR) in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations.
International Journal of Migration, Health and Social Care, 20 (1).
pp. 88-103.
ISSN 1747-9894
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmhsc-05-2023-0042
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Purpose: Mental health recovery across cultures lacks understanding and suitable measures. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) is a self-report instrument measuring personal recovery outcomes for patients of mental health services. However, the extent of its relevance among culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities is unclear. This pilot study aimed to examine the relevance and utility of the QPR among CALD patients of primary mental health services in Australia. Methodology: Eleven individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with two general practitioners (GPs) and nine consumers from two clinics, at locations with high Iranian and Burmese refugee or asylum seeker populations. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a thematic framework approach. Findings: Although almost all consumers had little or no understanding of the concept of personal recovery, they found the QPR culturally acceptable and understandable. Using the QPR during mental health consultations can help with needs identification and goal setting. Challenges in using the QPR included completion time, cross-cultural differences in concepts and norms for some items, and need for careful translation. Consumers suggested additional items regarding family reputation, sexuality, and spirituality. Originality: The QPR is potentially a valuable tool to support mental health consultations with CALD consumers, from the perspectives of both GPs and consumers. However, improvements in its usability and usefulness across cultures and evaluation with larger diverse samples are needed.
Description: This is an author accepted manuscript version of an article accepted for publication, and following peer review. Please be aware that minor differences may exist between this version and the final version if you wish to cite from it.