The new planning, reporting, monitoring and review mechanism under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and its implication for Japan

H Tomoi ORCID logo ; H Ishii ; T Ohsawa ; (2024) The new planning, reporting, monitoring and review mechanism under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and its implication for Japan. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 74 (1). pp. 123-132. ISSN 0021-5007 DOI: 10.18960/seitai.74.1_123
Copy

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is a comprehensive framework that includes mechanisms to enhance transparency in policy implementation. This paper outlines the enhanced planning, monitoring, reporting and review mechanism (so-called “PDCA cycle”) and considers its possible impact on Japan's national biodiversity strategies and action plans, implementation of policies, as well as domestic stakeholders. First, it was decided to standardise the content of national biodiversity strategies and action plans and national reports in line with the guidance documents. Parties will be required to plan and report their biodiversity policies bearing in mind the indicators for the global targets, by which transparency and comparability of national efforts will be strengthened. In addition, global reviews will be held in conjunction with the 17th and 19th Conferences of the Parties to the CBD (COP17 and COP19) to check the progress of the KMGBF, and each country can improve its own national strategy based on the reviews. With these new elements added, a PDCA cycle for biodiversity policy has been established internationally to a certain degree. In the future, expectations for various data and research ranging from ecology to economics are likely to increase both domestically and globally since they can contribute to understanding the progress and outcomes of biodiversity policies in an objective and comparable manner. Non-state actors such as private companies and researchers might be able to promote their activities if they are consistent with global targets. At the same time, however, there is also a risk that activities that cannot be reported using the indicators of KMGBF are less likely to be evaluated. Therefore, policies and services that will develop the capacity of all actors to plan, monitor and report in line with the KMGBF would be needed.


picture_as_pdf
Tomoi-etal-2024-The-new-planning-reporting-monitoring.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads