Davies, Jennifer C; Sargent, Alexandra; Pinggera, Elisabeth; Carter, Suzanne; Gilham, Clare; Sasieni, Peter; Crosbie, Emma J; (2024) Urine high-risk human papillomavirus testing as an alternative to routine cervical screening: A comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two urine collection devices using a randomised study design trial. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 131 (11). pp. 1456-1464. ISSN 1470-0328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17831
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity of human papillomavirus (HPV) tested urine to detect high-grade cervical precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ [CIN2+]) using two urine collection devices. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK. POPULATION: Colposcopy attendees with abnormal cervical screening; a total of 480 participants were randomised. Matched urine and cervical samples were available for 235 and 230 participants using a first-void urine (FVU)-collection device and standard pot, respectively. METHODS: Urine was self-collected and mixed with preservative - randomised 1:1 to FVU-collection device (Novosanis Colli-pee® 10 mL with urine conservation medium [UCM]) or standard pot. Matched clinician-collected cervical samples were taken before colposcopy. HPV testing used Roche cobas® 8800. A questionnaire evaluated urine self-sampling acceptability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured sensitivity of HPV-tested urine (FVU-collection device and standard pot) for CIN2+ detection. Secondary outcomes compared HPV-tested cervical and urine samples for CIN2+ and evaluated the acceptability of urine self-sampling. RESULTS: Urine HPV test sensitivity for CIN2+ was higher with the FVU-collection device (90.3%, 95% CI 83.7%-94.9%, 112/124) than the standard pot (73.4%, 95% CI 64.7%-80.9%, 91/124, p = 0.0005). The relative sensitivity of FVU-device-collected urine was 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.97, pMcN = 0.004) compared with cervical, considering that all women were referred after a positive cervical HPV test. Urine-based sampling was acceptable to colposcopy attendees. CONCLUSIONS: Testing of FVU-device-collected urine for HPV was superior to standard-pot-collected urine in colposcopy attendees and has promising sensitivity for CIN2+ detection. General population HPV testing of FVU-device-collected urine will establish its clinical performance and acceptability as an alternative to routine cervical screening.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology |
PubMed ID | 38660737 |
Elements ID | 219652 |
Official URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17831 |
Download
Filename: Davies BJOG 2024.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Download