Rametse, Cosnet L; Webb, Emily L; Herrera, Carolina; Alinde, Berenice; Besethi, Asiphe; Motaung, Bongani; Mbangiwa, Tshepiso; Leach, Lloyd; Sebaa, Shorok; Pillay, Azure-Dee AP; +18 more... Seiphetlo, Thabiso B; Malhangu, Boitshoko; Petkov, Stefan; Else, Laura; Mugaba, Susan; Namubiru, Patricia; Odoch, Geoffrey; Opoka, Daniel; Serwanga, Jennifer; Ssemata, Andrew S; Kaleebu, Pontiano; Khoo, Saye; Lebina, Limakatso; Martinson, Neil; Chiodi, Francesca; Fox, Julie; Gray, Clive M; CHAPS consortium; (2023) A randomized clinical trial of on-demand oral pre-exposure prophylaxis does not modulate lymphoid/myeloid HIV target cell density in the foreskin. AIDS (London, England), 37 (11). pp. 1651-1659. ISSN 0269-9370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000003619
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: As topical pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been shown to cause immune modulation in rectal or cervical tissue, our aim was to examine the impact of oral PrEP on lymphoid and myeloid changes in the foreskin in response to dosing and timing of drug administration. DESIGN: HIV-negative male individuals ( n = 144) were recruited in South Africa and Uganda into an open-label randomized controlled trial in a 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 ratio to control arm (with no PrEP) or one of eight arms receiving emtricitabine-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) or emtricitabine-tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) at one of two different doses, 5 or 21 h before undergoing voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC). METHODS: After dorsal-slit circumcision, foreskin tissue sections were embedded into Optimal Cutting Temperature media and analysed, blinded to trial allocation, to determine numbers of CD4 + CCR5 + , CD1a + cells and claudin-1 expression. Cell densities were correlated with tissue-bound drug metabolites and p24 production after ex-vivo foreskin challenge with HIV-1 bal . RESULTS: There was no significant difference in CD4 + CCR5 + or CD1a + cell numbers in foreskins between treatment arms compared with the control arm. Claudin-1 expression was 34% higher ( P = 0.003) in foreskin tissue from participants receiving PrEP relative to controls, but was no longer statistically significant after controlling for multiple comparisons. There was neither correlation of CD4 + CCR5 + , CD1a + cell numbers, or claudin-1 expression with tissue-bound drug metabolites, nor with p24 production after ex-vivo viral challenge. CONCLUSION: Oral doses and timing of on-demand PrEP and in-situ drug metabolite levels in tissue have no effect on numbers or anatomical location of lymphoid or myeloid HIV target cells in foreskin tissue.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department |
Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology & International Health (2023-) MRC Uganda > UG-HIV Care |
PubMed ID | 37289572 |
Elements ID | 204989 |
Official URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/qad.0000000000003619 |
Download
Filename: Rametse-etal-2023-A-Randomized-Clinical-Trial-of-On-Demand-Oral-Pre-Exposure-Prophylaxis-shows-no-impact-on-lymphoid-or-myeloid-HIV-Target-Cells-in-the-Foreskin.pdf
Description: This is an author accepted manuscript version of an article accepted for publication, and following peer review. Please be aware that minor differences may exist between this version and the final version if you wish to cite from it
Licence: Copyright the publishers
Download