Mendieta, Guiomar; Mehta, Shamir; Baber, Usman; Angiolillo, Dominick J; Briguori, Carlo; Cohen, David; Collier, Timothy; Dangas, George; Dudek, Dariusz; Escaned, Javier; +21 more... Gil, Robert; Vogel, Birgit; Cao, Davide; Spirito, Alessandro; Huber, Kurt; Kastrati, Adnan; Kaul, Upendra; Kornowski, Ran; Krucoff, Mitchell W; Kunadian, Vijay; Moliterno, David J; Ohman, E Magnus; Sardella, Gennaro; Sartori, Samantha; Sharma, Samin; Shlofmitz, Richard; Steg, P Gabriel; Han, Ya-Ling; Pocock, Stuart; Gibson, C Michael; Mehran, Roxana; (2023) Bleeding and Ischemic Risks of Ticagrelor Monotherapy After Coronary Interventions. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 82 (8). pp. 687-700. ISSN 0735-1097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.062
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention), among high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ticagrelor monotherapy vs continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor after completing a 3-month course of DAPT was associated with reduced bleeding, without an increase in ischemic events. OBJECTIVES: This investigation sought to study the clinical benefit of ticagrelor monotherapy vs DAPT by simultaneously modeling its associated potential bleeding benefits and ischemic harms on an individual patient basis. METHODS: Multivariable Cox regression models for: 1) Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5 (BARC-2/3/5); and 2) cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event [MACCE]) were developed using stepwise forward variable selection. The coefficients in the BARC-2/3/5 and MACCE models were used to calculate bleeding and ischemic risk scores, respectively, for each patient (excluding the coefficient for randomized treatment). RESULTS: In the total study group (N = 7,119), BARC-2/3/5 occurred in 391 (5.5%) patients, and MACCE occurred in 258 (3.6%). There was a consistent reduction in bleeding events associated with ticagrelor monotherapy compared with DAPT across both bleeding and ischemic risk strata (P interaction = 0.54 and 0.11, respectively). Importantly, this benefit associated with ticagrelor monotherapy was not offset by an increase in MACCE at any level of bleeding or ischemic risk. CONCLUSIONS: Three months after PCI, discontinuing aspirin and maintaining ticagrelor monotherapy reduces bleeding in both higher-bleeding risk and lower-bleeding risk patients compared with continued DAPT. This benefit does not appear to be offset by greater ischemic risk. (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients After Coronary Intervention [TWILIGHT]; NCT02270242).
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Medical Statistics |
PubMed ID | 37587580 |
Elements ID | 207859 |
Official URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.05.062 |
Download
Embargo Date: 14 August 2024
Restricted to: Repository staff only
Filename: Mendieta-etal-2023-Bleeding-and-ischemic-risks-of.pdf
Description: This is an author accepted manuscript version of an article accepted for publication, and following peer review. Please be aware that minor differences may exist between this version and the final version if you wish to cite from it.
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0