Can ultrasonic biometric indices with optimal cut-offs be a potential screening tool for primary angle closure disease? A case-control study.

Savur, S; Kaup, SORCID logo; Dinesh, A; Shivalli, SORCID logo; Kondal, D and (2022) Can ultrasonic biometric indices with optimal cut-offs be a potential screening tool for primary angle closure disease? A case-control study. EYE, 37 (6). pp. 1284-1289. ISSN 0950-222X DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02118-y
Copy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Despite a significant disease burden and potential to cause blindness, primary angle closure disease (PACD) does not have a population-based screening programme. Biometric indices using ultrasound A-scan is a potential tool for glaucoma case-detection. Given that genetic and environmental factors influence these parameters and paucity of data on their discrimination thresholds in Indian populace, we conducted a matched case-control study to determine the biometric indices and their discrimination thresholds associated with PACD. METHODS: We studied 172 eyes of 86 participants (43 cases; 43 controls). We compared the following biometric parameters of cases (PACD, occludable angle ≥180° ± raised intraocular pressure) with age and gender-matched controls (1:1): Anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AXL), lens position (LP), relative lens position (RLP), lens axial factor (LAF), simple crowding value (Cs), ACD/AXL). We performed conditional logistic regression (to identify factors associated with PACD) and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (to determine discrimination thresholds). RESULTS: Reduced ACD (Adj OR 0.01; 95% CI: 0.0003-0.15, p < 0.001) and increased LT (Adj OR 10.3; 95% CI:2.42-43.93, p < 0.001) were associated with PACD. On ROC analysis, ACD, Cs, and ACD/AXL had optimum sensitivity/specificity at ≤3.015, ≥0.056 and ≤0.1303, respectively. ACD (88.4%) and Cs (94.2%) had highest sensitivity and specificity, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ultrasonic biometric parameters differed significantly between PACD and controls. ACD and Cs (at discrimination thresholds of ≤3.015 mm and ≥ 0.056, respectively) using ultrasound A-scan could be a potential tool for PACD case-detection that requires evaluation of its diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness.


picture_as_pdf
Savur_etal_2022_Can-ultrasonic-biometric-indices.pdf
subject
Published Version
error
This is an author accepted manuscript version of an article accepted for publication, and following peer review. Please be aware that minor differences may exist between this version and the final version if you wish to cite from it.
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads