Ross, Ian; Cumming, Oliver; Dreibelbis, Robert; Adriano, Zaida; Nala, Rassul; Greco, Giulia; (2021) How does sanitation influence people's quality of life? Qualitative research in low-income areas of Maputo, Mozambique. Social Science & Medicine, 272. 113709-. ISSN 0277-9536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113709
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
Preventing infectious disease has often been the primary rationale for public investment in sanitation. However, broader aspects of sanitation such as privacy and safety are important to users across settings, and have been linked to mental wellbeing. The aim of this study is to investigate what people most value about sanitation in low-income areas of Maputo, Mozambique, to inform a definition and conceptual model of sanitation-related quality of life. Our approach to qualitative research was rooted in economics and applied the capability approach, bringing a focus on what people had reason to value. We undertook 19 in-depth interviews and 8 focus group discussions. After eliciting attributes of "a good life" in general, we used them to structure discussion of what was valuable about sanitation. We applied framework analysis to identify core attributes of sanitation-related quality of life, and used pile-sorting and triad exercises to triangulate findings on attributes' relative importance. The five core attributes identified were health, disgust, shame, safety, and privacy. We present a conceptual model illustrating how sanitation interventions might improve quality of life via changes in these attributes, and how changes are likely to be moderated by conversion factors (e.g. individual and environmental characteristics). The five capability-based attributes are consistent with those identified in studies of sanitation-related insecurity, stress and motives in both rural and urban areas, which is supportive of theoretical generalisability. Since two people might experience the same toilet or level of sanitation service differently, quality of life effects of interventions may be heterogeneous. Future evaluations of sanitation interventions should consider how changes in quality of life might be captured.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department |
Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases > Dept of Disease Control Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Dept of Global Health and Development |
Research Centre | Global Health Economics Centre |
PubMed ID | 33517125 |
Elements ID | 155568 |
Download
Filename: 1-s2.0-S0277953621000411-main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
Download