Jung, Young Hee; Wi, Dae Han; Shin, Sang Do; Tanaka, Hideharu; Shaun, Goh E; Chiang, Wen-Chu; Sun, Jen-Tang; Hsu, Li-Min; Kajino, Kentaro; Jamaluddin, Sabariah Faizah; +8 more... Kimura, Akio; Holmes, James F; Song, Kyoung Jun; Ro, Young Sun; Hong, Ki Jeong; Moon, Sung Woo; Park, Ju Ok; Kim, Min Jung; (2019) Comparison of trauma systems in Asian countries: a cross-sectional study. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 6 (4). pp. 321-329. ISSN 2383-4625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.18.088
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the demographic characteristics and trauma service structures and processes of hospitals in 15 countries across the Asia Pacific, and to provide baseline data for the integrated trauma database: the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcomes Study (PATOS). METHODS: Medical directors and emergency physicians at PATOS-participating hospitals in countries across the Asia Pacific were surveyed through a standardized questionnaire. General information, trauma care system data, and trauma emergency department (ED) outcomes at each hospital were collected by email and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Survey data from 35 hospitals across 15 countries were collected from archived data between June 2014 and July 2015. Designated trauma centers were identified as the highest hospital level for trauma patients in 70% of surveyed countries. Half of the hospitals surveyed had special teams for trauma care, and almost all prepared activation protocol documents for these teams. Most hospitals offered specialized trauma education programs, and 72.7% of hospitals had a hospital-based trauma registry. The total number of trauma patients visiting the ED across 25 of the hospitals was 300,376. The overall survival-to-discharge rate was 97.2%; however, it varied greatly between 85.1% and 99.7%. The difference between survival-to-discharge rates of moderate and severe injury groups was highest in Taiwan (41.8%) and lowest in Thailand (18.6%). CONCLUSION: Trauma care systems and ED outcomes vary widely among surveyed hospitals and countries. This information is useful to build further detailed, systematic platforms for trauma surveillance and evidence-based trauma care policies.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Infectious Disease Epidemiology |
Research Centre | International Centre for Eye Health |
PubMed ID | 31910503 |
Elements ID | 145144 |
Download
Filename: Comparison of trauma systems in Asian countries a cross-sectional study.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0
Download