Impact of Different Sampling Schemes for Decision Making in Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis Control Programs.
Coffeng, Luc E;
Malizia, Veronica;
Vegvari, Carolin;
Cools, Piet;
Halliday, Katherine E;
Levecke, Bruno;
Mekonnen, Zeleke;
Gichuki, Paul M;
Sayasone, Somphou;
Sarkar, Rajiv;
+4 more...Shaali, Ame;
Vlaminck, Johnny;
Anderson, Roy M;
de Vlas, Sake J;
(2019)
Impact of Different Sampling Schemes for Decision Making in Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis Control Programs.
The Journal of infectious diseases, 221 (Suppl ).
S531-S538.
ISSN 0022-1899
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiz535
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Starting and stopping preventive chemotherapy (PC) for soil-transmitted helminthiasis is typically based on the prevalence of infection as measured by Kato-Katz (KK) fecal smears. Kato-Katz-based egg counts can vary highly over repeated stool samples and smears. Consequentially, the sensitivity of KK-based surveys depends on the number of stool samples per person and the number of smears per sample. Given finite resources, collecting multiple samples and/or smears means screening fewer individuals, thereby lowering the statistical precision of prevalence estimates. Using population-level data from various epidemiological settings, we assessed the performance of different sampling schemes executed within the confines of the same budget. We recommend the use of single-slide KK for determining prevalence of moderate-to-heavy intensity infection and policy decisions for starting and continuing PC; more sensitive sampling schemes may be required for policy decisions involving stopping PC. Our findings highlight that guidelines should include specific guidance on sampling schemes.