Evaluation of the Active Melioidosis Detect™ test as a point-of-care tool for the early diagnosis of melioidosis: a comparison with culture in Laos.
Rizzi, Maria Chiara;
Rattanavong, Sayaphet;
Bouthasavong, Latsaniphone;
Seubsanith, Amphayvanh;
Vongsouvath, Manivanh;
Davong, Viengmon;
De Silvestri, Annalisa;
Manciulli, Tommaso;
Newton, Paul N;
Dance, David AB;
(2019)
Evaluation of the Active Melioidosis Detect™ test as a point-of-care tool for the early diagnosis of melioidosis: a comparison with culture in Laos.
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 113 (12).
pp. 757-763.
ISSN 0035-9203
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/trz092
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
BACKGROUND: Melioidosis is difficult to diagnose clinically and culture of Burkholderia pseudomallei is the current, imperfect gold standard. However, a reliable point-of-care test (POCT) could enable earlier treatment and improve outcomes. METHODS: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the Active Melioidosis Detect™ (AMD) rapid test as a POCT and determined how much it reduced the time to diagnosis compared with culture. RESULTS: We tested 106 whole blood, plasma and buffy coat samples, 96 urine, 28 sputum and 20 pus samples from 112 patients, of whom 26 (23.2%) were culture-positive for B. pseudomallei. AMD sensitivity and specificity were 65.4 and 87.2%, respectively, the latter related to 10 weak positive reactions on urine samples, considered likely false positives. The positive predictive value was 60.7%, negative predictive value was 89.3% and concordance rate between operators reading the test was 95.7%; time to diagnosis decreased by a median of 23 h. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that a strongly positive AMD result can reduce the time to diagnosis of melioidosis. However, the AMD currently has a disappointing overall sensitivity, especially with blood fractions, and specificity problems when testing urine samples.