Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial

Dyer, MT; Goldsmith, KA; Khan, SN; Sharples, LD; Freeman, C; Hardy, I; Buxton, MJ; Schofield, PM; (2008) Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus percutaneous myocardial laser revascularisation (PMR) in patients with refractory angina pectoris: The SPiRiT trial. TRIALS, 9 (1). ISSN 1745-6215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-40

Permanent Identifier

Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-9-40

Abstract

Share

Download

Filename: Clinical and cost-effectiveness analysis of an open label, single-centre, randomised trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) .pdf

Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0

Download
[img]

Downloads

View details

Metrics & Citations


Google Scholar