Schomaker, M; Luque-Fernandez, MA; Leroy, V; Davies, MA; (2019) Using longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation in complex settings with dynamic interventions. Statistics in medicine, 38 (24). pp. 4888-4911. ISSN 0277-6715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8340
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
Abstract
Longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimation (LTMLE) has very rarely been used to estimate dynamic treatment effects in the context of time-dependent confounding affected by prior treatment when faced with long follow-up times, multiple time-varying confounders, and complex associational relationships simultaneously. Reasons for this include the potential computational burden, technical challenges, restricted modeling options for long follow-up times, and limited practical guidance in the literature. However, LTMLE has desirable asymptotic properties, ie, it is doubly robust, and can yield valid inference when used in conjunction with machine learning. It also has the advantage of easy-to-calculate analytic standard errors in contrast to the g-formula, which requires bootstrapping. We use a topical and sophisticated question from HIV treatment research to show that LTMLE can be used successfully in complex realistic settings, and we compare results to competing estimators. Our example illustrates the following practical challenges common to many epidemiological studies: (1) long follow-up time (30 months); (2) gradually declining sample size; (3) limited support for some intervention rules of interest; (4) a high-dimensional set of potential adjustment variables, increasing both the need and the challenge of integrating appropriate machine learning methods; and (5) consideration of collider bias. Our analyses, as well as simulations, shed new light on the application of LTMLE in complex and realistic settings: We show that (1) LTMLE can yield stable and good estimates, even when confronted with small samples and limited modeling options; (2) machine learning utilized with a small set of simple learners (if more complex ones cannot be fitted) can outperform a single, complex model, which is tailored to incorporate prior clinical knowledge; and (3) performance can vary considerably depending on interventions and their support in the data, and therefore critical quality checks should accompany every LTMLE analysis. We provide guidance for the practical application of LTMLE.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology |
Research Centre | Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network |
Official URL | https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05005 |
Download
Filename: 1802.05005v9.pdf
Description: Added by DR Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez in a redeposit operation from Symplectic Elements.
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
Download