Sodium stibogluconate (SSG) & paromomycin combination compared to SSG for visceral leishmaniasis in East Africa: a randomised controlled trial.

Musa, Ahmed; Khalil, Eltahir; Hailu, Asrat; Olobo, Joseph; Balasegaram, Manica; Omollo, Raymond; Edwards, TansyORCID logo; Rashid, Juma; Mbui, Jane; Musa, Brima; +28 more...Abuzaid, Abuzaid Abdalla; Ahmed, Osama; Fadlalla, Ahmed; El-Hassan, Ahmed; Mueller, Marius; Mucee, Geoffrey; Njoroge, Simon; Manduku, Veronica; Mutuma, Geoffrey; Apadet, Lilian; Lodenyo, Hudson; Mutea, Dedan; Kirigi, George; Yifru, Sisay; Mengistu, Getahun; Hurissa, Zewdu; Hailu, Workagegnehu; Weldegebreal, Teklu; Tafes, Hailemariam; Mekonnen, Yalemtsehay; Makonnen, Eyasu; Ndegwa, Serah; Sagaki, Patrick; Kimutai, Robert; Kesusu, Josephine; Owiti, Rhoda; Ellis, Sally; and Wasunna, Monique (2012) Sodium stibogluconate (SSG) & paromomycin combination compared to SSG for visceral leishmaniasis in East Africa: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 6 (6). e1674-. ISSN 1935-2727 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001674
Copy

BACKGROUND: Alternative treatments for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) are required in East Africa. Paromomycin sulphate (PM) has been shown to be efficacious for VL treatment in India. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized-controlled trial (RCT) to compare efficacy and safety of PM (20 mg/kg/day for 21 days) and PM plus sodium stibogluconate (SSG) combination (PM, 15 mg/kg/day and SSG, 20 mg/kg/day for 17 days) with SSG (20 mg/kg/day for 30 days) for treatment of VL in East Africa. Patients aged 4-60 years with parasitologically confirmed VL were enrolled, excluding patients with contraindications. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were parasite clearance at 6-months follow-up and end of treatment, respectively. Safety was assessed mainly using adverse event (AE) data. FINDINGS: The PM versus SSG comparison enrolled 205 patients per arm with primary efficacy data available for 198 and 200 patients respectively. The SSG & PM versus SSG comparison enrolled 381 and 386 patients per arm respectively, with primary efficacy data available for 359 patients per arm. In Intention-to-Treat complete-case analyses, the efficacy of PM was significantly lower than SSG (84.3% versus 94.1%, difference = 9.7%, 95% confidence interval, CI: 3.6 to 15.7%, p = 0.002). The efficacy of SSG & PM was comparable to SSG (91.4% versus 93.9%, difference = 2.5%, 95% CI: -1.3 to 6.3%, p = 0.198). End of treatment efficacy results were very similar. There were no apparent differences in the safety profile of the three treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: The 17 day SSG & PM combination treatment had a good safety profile and was similar in efficacy to the standard 30 day SSG treatment, suggesting suitability for VL treatment in East Africa. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00255567.


picture_as_pdf
pntd.0001674.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads