Data linkage errors in hospital administrative data when applying a pseudonymisation algorithm to paediatric intensive care records.
Hagger-Johnson, Gareth;
Harron, Katie;
Fleming, Tom;
Gilbert, Ruth;
Goldstein, Harvey;
Landy, Rebecca;
Parslow, Roger C;
(2015)
Data linkage errors in hospital administrative data when applying a pseudonymisation algorithm to paediatric intensive care records.
BMJ open, 5 (8).
e008118-.
ISSN 2044-6055
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008118
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to estimate the rate of data linkage error in Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) by testing the HESID pseudoanonymisation algorithm against a reference standard, in a national registry of paediatric intensive care records. SETTING: The Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) database, covering 33 paediatric intensive care units in England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Data from infants and young people aged 0-19 years admitted between 1 January 2004 and 21 February 2014. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: PICANet admission records were classified as matches (records belonging to the same patient who had been readmitted) or non-matches (records belonging to different patients) after applying the HESID algorithm to PICANet records. False-match and missed-match rates were calculated by comparing results of the HESID algorithm with the reference standard PICANet ID. The effect of linkage errors on readmission rate was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 166,406 admissions, 88,596 were true matches (where the same patient had been readmitted). The HESID pseudonymisation algorithm produced few false matches (n=176/77,810; 0.2%) but a larger proportion of missed matches (n=3609/88,596; 4.1%). The true readmission rate was underestimated by 3.8% due to linkage errors. Patients who were younger, male, from Asian/Black/Other ethnic groups (vs White) were more likely to experience a false match. Missed matches were more common for younger patients, for Asian/Black/Other ethnic groups (vs White) and for patients whose records had missing data. CONCLUSIONS: The deterministic algorithm used to link all episodes of hospital care for the same patient in England has a high missed match rate which underestimates the true readmission rate and will produce biased analyses. To reduce linkage error, pseudoanonymisation algorithms need to be validated against good quality reference standards. Pseudonymisation of data 'at source' does not itself address errors in patient identifiers and the impact these errors have on data linkage.
