Comparative efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in the third-line setting, for chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia after failure of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Lipton, JH;
Bryden, P;
Sidhu, MK;
Huang, H;
McGarry, LJ;
Lustgarten, S;
Mealing, S;
Woods, B;
Whelan, J;
Hawkins, N;
(2014)
Comparative efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in the third-line setting, for chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia after failure of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Leukemia research, 39 (1).
pp. 58-64.
ISSN 0145-2126
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2014.10.005
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
We compared the efficacy of ponatinib and second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKIs: bosutinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib) in chronic phase CML resistant/intolerant to ≥1 prior 2G-TKI. Estimated probabilities of CCyR with 2G-TKI ranged from 22% to 26%, compared with 60% (95% CrI 52-68%) with ponatinib. The estimated probability of ponatinib providing higher response rate than all other included treatments was 99% (CCyR) and 97% (MCyR). Use of further 2G-TKI may provide limited benefit in CP-CML patients resistant/intolerant to prior 2G-TKI treatment. Compared with 2G-TKIs, ponatinib is estimated to provide substantially higher probability of achieving CCyR and MCyR; safety was not compared.