Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
Bruno
Giraudeau
;
Clémence
Leyrat
;
Amélie
Le Gouge
;
Julie
Léger
;
Agnès
Caille
;
(2011)
Peer review of grant applications: a simple method to identify proposals with discordant reviews.
PloS one, 6 (11).
e27557-.
ISSN 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027557
Grant proposals submitted for funding are usually selected by a peer-review rating process. Some proposals may result in discordant peer-review ratings and therefore require discussion by the selection committee members. The issue is which peer-review ratings are considered as discordant. We propose a simple method to identify such proposals. Our approach is based on the intraclass correlation coefficient, which is usually used in assessing agreement in studies with continuous ratings.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
ISI | 297554300036 |
Date Deposited | 07 Mar 2016 20:13 |
Explore Further
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3215721 (OA Location)
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0027557 (DOI)
- 22110670 (PubMed)
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4097-4577