Job strain and tobacco smoking: an individual-participant data meta-analysis of 166,130 adults in 15 European studies.

Katriina Heikkilä ; Solja T Nyberg ; Eleonor I Fransson ; Lars Alfredsson ; Dirk De Bacquer ; Jakob B Bjorner ; Sébastien Bonenfant ; Marianne Borritz ; Hermann Burr ; Els Clays ; +40 more... Annalisa Casini ; Nico Dragano ; Raimund Erbel ; Goedele A Geuskens ; Marcel Goldberg ; Wendela E Hooftman ; Irene L Houtman ; Matti Joensuu ; Karl-Heinz Jöckel ; France Kittel ; Anders Knutsson ; Markku Koskenvuo ; Aki Koskinen ; Anne Kouvonen ; Constanze Leineweber ; Thorsten Lunau ; Ida EH Madsen ; Linda L Magnusson Hanson ; Michael G Marmot ; Martin L Nielsen ; Maria Nordin ; Jaana Pentti ; Paula Salo ; Reiner Rugulies ; Andrew Steptoe ; Johannes Siegrist ; Sakari Suominen ; Jussi Vahtera ; Marianna Virtanen ; Ari Väänänen ; Peter Westerholm ; Hugo Westerlund ; Marie Zins ; Töres Theorell ; Mark Hamer ; Jane E Ferrie ; Archana Singh-Manoux ; G David Batty ; Mika Kivimäki ; IPD-Work Consortium ; (2012) Job strain and tobacco smoking: an individual-participant data meta-analysis of 166,130 adults in 15 European studies. PloS one, 7 (7). e35463-. ISSN 1932-6203 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035463
Copy

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is a major contributor to the public health burden and healthcare costs worldwide, but the determinants of smoking behaviours are poorly understood. We conducted a large individual-participant meta-analysis to examine the extent to which work-related stress, operationalised as job strain, is associated with tobacco smoking in working adults. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We analysed cross-sectional data from 15 European studies comprising 166,130 participants. Longitudinal data from six studies were used. Job strain and smoking were self-reported. Smoking was harmonised into three categories never, ex- and current. We modelled the cross-sectional associations using logistic regression and the results pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to examine longitudinal associations. Of the 166,130 participants, 17% reported job strain, 42% were never smokers, 33% ex-smokers and 25% current smokers. In the analyses of the cross-sectional data, current smokers had higher odds of job strain than never-smokers (age, sex and socioeconomic position-adjusted odds ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.18). Current smokers with job strain smoked, on average, three cigarettes per week more than current smokers without job strain. In the analyses of longitudinal data (1 to 9 years of follow-up), there was no clear evidence for longitudinal associations between job strain and taking up or quitting smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that smokers are slightly more likely than non-smokers to report work-related stress. In addition, smokers who reported work stress smoked, on average, slightly more cigarettes than stress-free smokers.


picture_as_pdf
pone.0035463.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL Data Cite XML EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads