Mangham-Jefferies, L; (2014) What strategies are cost-effective in improving health care for women and their newborns? London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/1883876
Permanent Identifier
Use this permanent URL when citing or linking to this resource.
https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/1883876
Abstract
Findings from a systematic review, conducted by Dr Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies and colleagues for the IDEAS project at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Key messages: •Cost-effective strategies are needed to improve the use and provision of maternal and newborn health care, and increase the coverage of maternal and newborn health interventions. •Demand and supply-side strategies can be cost-effective, and there is strong evidence in certain contexts. •Questions remain about the extent to which both costs and effects vary by implementation, context and scale. •Evidence is limited by the number of studies on different types of demand and supply strategies and the lack of high quality studies using comparable cost-effectiveness measures. •More attention should be given to the design and reporting of cost-effectiveness studies.
Item Type | Other |
---|---|
Keywords | cost-effective, maternal, newborn, mother, woman, low-income, middle-income |
Faculty and Department |
Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases > Dept of Disease Control Faculty of Public Health and Policy |
Research Centre |
Centre for Evaluation Centre for Maternal, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH) IDEAS |
Research Group | IDEAS |
Funder Name | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation |
Projects | IDEAS |
Copyright Holders | London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine |
Download
Filename: CostEffectivenessMaternalNewbornHealthResearchBrief_20Aug2014.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0
Download