Freemantle, Nick; Nazareth, Irwin; Eccles, Martin; Wood, John; Haines, Andrew; Evidence-based OutReach trialists; (2002) A randomised controlled trial of the effect of educational outreach by community pharmacists on prescribing in UK general practice. The British journal of general practice, 52 (477). pp. 290-295. ISSN 0960-1643 https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/18285
Permanent Identifier
Use this permanent URL when citing or linking to this resource.
https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/18285
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Educational outreach visits are commonly used to promote changes in prescribing in family practice. However, the effectiveness of outreach visits has not been evaluated across a range of settings. AIM: To estimate the effectiveness of educational outreach visits on United Kingdom (UK) general practice prescribing and to examine the extent to which practice characteristics influenced outcome. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: General practices in 12 health authorities in England. METHOD: Educational outreach visits were made to practices that received two of four guidelines. Each practice provided data on treatment of patients for all four guidelines for both pre and post-intervention periods. The primary outcome is average effect across all four guidelines. Secondary analyses examined the predictive effect of practice and guideline characteristics. RESULTS: Seventy per cent of practices approached agreed to take part in the intervention. Overall, educational outreach was associated with a significant improvement in prescribing practice (odds ratio [OR] = 1.24 [95% CI = 1.07 to 1.42]), a 5.2% (95% CI = 1.7% to 8.7%) increase in the number of patients treated within the guideline recommendations. Smaller practices (two or fewer full-time equivalent practitioners) responded much more favourably to educational outreach than larger practices. Smaller practices improved their performance in line with the guidelines by 13.5% (95% CI = 6% to 20.9%) attributable to outreach, while larger practices improved by only 1.4% (95% CI = -2.4% to 5.3%, P-value for interaction <0.001). CONCLUSION: In large practices, educational outreach alone is unlikely to achieve worthwhile change. There is good evidence to support the use of educational outreach visits in small practices.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Keywords | Community Pharmacy Services, organization & administration, standards, Community-Institutional Relations, Drug Utilization, standards, Education, Medical, Continuing, methods, England, Evidence-Based Medicine, Family Practice, education, standards, Human, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Physician's Practice Patterns, standards, Practice Guidelines, State Medicine, Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
Faculty and Department | Faculty of Public Health and Policy > Public Health, Environments and Society |
Research Centre | Centre for Global Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) |
PubMed ID | 11942445 |
ISI | 174721900008 |
Related URLs |