The cost-effectiveness of herpes simplex virus-2 suppressive therapy with daily aciclovir for delaying HIV disease progression among HIV-1-infected women in South Africa.
Vickerman, Peter;
Devine, Angela;
Foss, Anna M;
Delany-Moretlwe, Sinead;
Mayaud, Philippe;
Meyer-Rath, Gesine;
(2011)
The cost-effectiveness of herpes simplex virus-2 suppressive therapy with daily aciclovir for delaying HIV disease progression among HIV-1-infected women in South Africa.
Sexually transmitted diseases, 38 (5).
pp. 401-409.
ISSN 0148-5717
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31820b8bc8
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
BACKGROUND: The Partners in Prevention HSV/HIV transmission trial (Partners HSV/HIV Transmission Study) showed that herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2) suppressive therapy with daily aciclovir could decrease HIV disease progression amongst HIV-1/HSV-2 coinfected individuals. The cost-effectiveness of daily aciclovir for delaying HIV-1 disease progression in women not eligible for antiretroviral therapy (ART) is estimated. METHODS: Resource use/cost data for delivering daily aciclovir at a primary health care HIV clinic were collected in Johannesburg. Effectiveness estimates were obtained from the Partners HSV/HIV Transmission Study trial and epidemiologic data from South Africa. A Markov model simulated the cost-effectiveness of daily aciclovir on HIV-1 disease progression in ART-naive women. Therapy was given to all HIV-1-infected women. Cost-effectiveness was compared against cost per life-year gained (∼US $1200 per LYG) of ART provision in South Africa. RESULTS: For an ART eligibility criteria of CD4 count <200 cells/μL and the cheapest internationally available aciclovir (US $0.026 per day for 2 × 400 mg aciclovir), the median cost per LYG is US $1023 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 537-2842), whereas it decreases to US $737 (95% CI: 373-2489) if the ART eligibility criteria is CD4 count <350 cells/μL. Both these projections compare favorably with the estimated cost-effectiveness of ART in South Africa (∼US $1200 per LYG). The cost per LYG increases dramatically for the current aciclovir cost in South Africa (US $0.14 per day), if salary costs are higher and if HSV-2 prevalence amongst HIV-1-infected women are lower. Projections suggest HSV-2 suppressive therapy could dramatically increase the proportion of women initiating ART. CONCLUSIONS: HSV-2 suppressive therapy could be an affordable strategy for reducing HIV-1 disease progression and retaining women in care before ART initiation, but cheaply available aciclovir is needed.