Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence?

Lawlor, Debbie A; Davey Smith, George; Kundu, Devi; Bruckdorfer, K Richard; Ebrahim, Shah; (2004) Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence? Lancet, 363 (9422). pp. 1724-1727. ISSN 0140-6736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16260-0

Additional Information

Item Type	Article
Keywords	Anthropometry, Antioxidants/therapeutic use, Ascorbic Acid/blood/therapeutic use, Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control, Causality, Comparative Study, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), Health Behavior, Humans, Life Style, Observation, *Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Socioeconomic Factors, Anthropometry, Antioxidants, therapeutic use, Ascorbic Acid, blood, therapeutic use, Cardiovascular Diseases, prevention & control, Causality, Comparative Study, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), Health Behavior, Humans, Life Style, Observation, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Design, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Socioeconomic Factors
Faculty and Department	Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health > Dept of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology
Research Centre	Centre for Global Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)
PubMed ID	15158637
ISI	221546300023

Downloads

View details

Metrics & Citations

Google Scholar

Report this Record Edit item (admin only) View this record in elements

LSHTM LSHTM Research Online

Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence?

Permanent Identifier

Abstract

Additional Information

Share

Download

Downloads

Metrics & Citations

Google Scholar