Balancing protection and pragmatism: a framework for NGO accountability in rights-based approaches.
Mayhew, Susannah;
Douthwaite, Megan;
Hammer, Michael;
(2006)
Balancing protection and pragmatism: a framework for NGO accountability in rights-based approaches.
Health and human rights, 9 (2).
pp. 180-206.
ISSN 1079-0969
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4065407
Permanent Identifier
Use this Digital Object Identifier when citing or linking to this resource.
In the classic understanding of human rights obligations, the state is considered the primary duty-bearer. Governments, however, are increasingly handing over their function of delivering health services to NGOs. This article argues that because of these new and increasing responsibilities, NGOs should also be seen as duty-bearers required to uphold rights through their services, activities, and principles of operation. Translating human rights norms into practical, measurable activities remains a challenge. We worked with organizations delivering HIV-related services to prisoners and injecting drug users in Malawi and Pakistan. The aim was to develop a simple, practical framework of activities and indicators to provide accountability standards against which NGOs could be held accountable for progressively realizing the rights of their clients.